2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preferences of the Spanish fishermen and their contribution on reform of the European Common Fisheries Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Johnsen, 2017) and European-Union-level policies (e.g. European Common Fisheries Policy) (Garza-Gil & Varela-Lafuente, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Johnsen, 2017) and European-Union-level policies (e.g. European Common Fisheries Policy) (Garza-Gil & Varela-Lafuente, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnsen, 2017) and European‐Union‐level policies (e.g. European Common Fisheries Policy) (Garza‐Gil & Varela‐Lafuente, 2015). Hence, fisher behaviour has emerged as an important subject of fisheries governance, and as a lens into contextual knowledge required to steer policy change at multiple scales (Bennett, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, knowledge about the affected economic agents' perceptions could help reduce or even prevent conflicts involving fishers [4,5]. Such knowledge could also enhance the legitimacy of regulatory institutions and increase the extent to which relevant actors comply with regulations [6][7][8][9]. A number of studies that focus on agents' attitudes toward the decision-making process vis-à-vis fisheries have been conducted in recent decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As van Overzee and Rijnsdorp (2015) argued, studies about the efficacy of management interventions can be extremely challenging, if not impossible, to carry out due to the difficulties of conducting replicated experiments in real fishery systems; therefore, alternative approaches are often used. The appraisal of perceptions has been shown to be a valuable policy-making tool because it enriches understanding of the experience and needs of user groups, informs decision-makers, and can help in the design and revisions of policy interventions (Pomeroy, 1995;Marshall, 2007;Pita et al, 2011a;Amigo-Dobaño et al, 2012;Leule et al, 2012;Garza-Gil and Varela-Lafuente, 2015;Bennett, 2016;Gelcich and O'Keeffe, 2016;Heinen et al, 2017). Favorable perceptions are indicative of the management actions deemed to be beneficial and equitable, which encourages compliance (Marshall, 2007;Pita et al, 2011b;Gelcich and O'Keeffe, 2016;Agar et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%