2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The preliminary analysis of the reliability and validity of the Chinese Edition of the CSBS DP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They felt that cultural differences, including unfamiliarity with the testing situation and test administrators, could explain these differences. However, scores on the CSBD DP did demonstrate sufficient concurrent and predictive validity to suggest that the tool shows promise for their cultural context although further research is needed to establish a local national norm (Lin et al 2015). Carter et al (2005) highlight a number of factors that can affect children's performance on tests developed in other cultures.…”
Section: Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scales-developmental Prmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They felt that cultural differences, including unfamiliarity with the testing situation and test administrators, could explain these differences. However, scores on the CSBD DP did demonstrate sufficient concurrent and predictive validity to suggest that the tool shows promise for their cultural context although further research is needed to establish a local national norm (Lin et al 2015). Carter et al (2005) highlight a number of factors that can affect children's performance on tests developed in other cultures.…”
Section: Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scales-developmental Prmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Carter et al (2005) highlight a number of factors that can affect children's performance on tests developed in other cultures. These include familiarity with testing situations (as suggested by Lin et al 2015), the influence of literacy and formal schooling, language diversity and dialects, and familiarity with picture recognition (Carter et al 2005). Some of these factors are relevant to the current study and others may be less relevant due to the fact that the CSBS DP evaluates such young children.…”
Section: Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scales-developmental Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.18514 540 http://www.e-csd.org YoonKyoung Lee, et (Chambers et al, 2017), 임상 및 교육의 유 용성이 높은 평가되고 있어 중국과 대만 (Lin & Chiu, 2014;Lin, Chang, Cheng, Chao, & Chiu, 2015) Education level of parents High school 4 (6.6) 6 (9.8) 7 (13.5) 6 (11.5) 5 (9.1) 4 (7.3) 7 (7.6) 8 (8.7) 23 (8.8) 24 (9.2) Junior college 3 (4.9) 6 (9.8) 1 (1.9) 2 (3.8) 1 (1.8) 1 (1.8) 3 (3.3) 6 (6.5) 8 (Wetherby & Prizant, 2002); SELSI = Sequenced Language Scale for Infants (Kim, Kim, Yoon, & Kim, 2003). **p < .01.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%