DOI: 10.1159/000415661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Present Status of Surgery in the Treatment of Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx and Cervical Oesophagus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18] For the past 15 years, several explanations for this is the fact that currently, there is no objective tool to predict good or bad response to c h e m~t h e r a p y .~~-~~ Quantitative DNA measurements have demonstrated prognostic significance in head and neck carcinomas in order to predict the overall survival…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15][16][17][18] For the past 15 years, several explanations for this is the fact that currently, there is no objective tool to predict good or bad response to c h e m~t h e r a p y .~~-~~ Quantitative DNA measurements have demonstrated prognostic significance in head and neck carcinomas in order to predict the overall survival…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional treatment strategies for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas consists of surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. [15][16][17][18] For the past 15 years, several The changes in the DNA data in the responder group are evident after the first course of chemotherapy, which is highly significant (p = 0.001 for mean DNA content, p = 0.001 for 2c DI, p = 0.001 for 5c ER, and p = 0.002 for DNA-MG). In the nonresponders, only minor changes occur after the first course of Chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%