“…(Murphy, 1986) Literature review 22% -90.4% (Murray, 1976) Literature review (Crawford, 1982b) National Center for State Courts (NCSC) studies (Broder, Dunivant, Smith, & Sutton, 1981;Dunivant, 1984;Keilitz & Dunivant, 1986;Zimmerman, Rich, Keilitz, & Broder, 1981) 10.6% -90.4% 33% -36% 16 -19% The significant discrepancy between prevalence reports has been attributed to a number of factors: (a) inconsistent definitions (Murphy, 1986: Murray, 1976, (b) procedural methods and data analysis (Murray, 1976), (c) lack of uniform assessment criteria (Murphy, 1986), (d) variance of age groups classified as juvenile (Murphy, 1986), and (e) variance of offender characteristics, i.e., status regarding seriousness and number of offenses and incarceration (Murphy, 1986). High prevalence estimates have led educators, parents, and the juvenile justice system to be concerned about a possible link between learning disabilities and juvenile delinquency.…”