1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb02553.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of latex allergy in children seen in a university hospital allergy clinic

Abstract: Natural rubber latex allergy is responsible for a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, ranging from rhinoconjunctivitis to severe anaphylaxis, in both adults and children. An association between allergy to latex and allergy to various fruits has been reported. This study investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of latex sensitization in children seen in a university hospital allergy clinic. A total of 453 consecutive children were screened in a 7-month period. A detailed clinical history with parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, comparing the IB profiles of SL and RPE extracts we can observe that, in some cases, the results were different (e.g. : sera 5,6,7,8,9,10,13,15) suggesting that different allergens or, alternatively, different concentrations of the same allergen can be contained in the extracts under consideration. This difference appears evident considering the IE profile of sera 4, 10 and 15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, comparing the IB profiles of SL and RPE extracts we can observe that, in some cases, the results were different (e.g. : sera 5,6,7,8,9,10,13,15) suggesting that different allergens or, alternatively, different concentrations of the same allergen can be contained in the extracts under consideration. This difference appears evident considering the IE profile of sera 4, 10 and 15.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex procedure required to obtain them, the variability of the amount of latex proteins present, and the high risk of appearance of systemic reactions during skin tests have discouraged allergen manufacturers from using them in the preparation of a diagnostic commercial latex extract (9). Ammoniated and nonammoniated latex (AL and NAL respectively) have been introduced in the preparation of SPT extracts and used in the diagnosis oflatex allergy (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, 609 sera of atopic and nonatopic children (mean age 4.5 years) were screened for specific IgE to latex and it was found that 20.8% of the atopic (and 0.3% of the nonatopic) children were sensitized to latex [11]. Other authors found lower values for atopic children: Novembre et al [12]reported on 3% of atopic children (mean age 7 years) being sensitized to latex. This discrepancy may be explained by the patient characteristics seen in university allergy clinics; in our study there was a high degree of children with atopic dermatitis among children with a positive provocation test (75%), and atopic dermatitis seems to present a special risk group.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a detailed history is important and the question ‘What happens when you blow up a balloon?’ has a high specificity in children, the sensitivity of taking a history is only around 50% in children with positive latex challenges [12, 19, 22]. …”
Section: Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of latex allergy in the general population is believed to be less than 1%. 35,36,37 People who have a genetic predisposition for allergy ("atopics") may have a 3-7% prevalence of latex allergy. 34,35 Studies in health care workers have shown latex allergy prevalence rates of 2-16.9%.…”
Section: Latexmentioning
confidence: 99%