2015
DOI: 10.18549/pharmpract.2015.04.601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of major potential drug-drug interactions at a University health centre pharmacy in Jamaica

Abstract: Objective:To identify major potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) on prescriptions filled at the University Health Centre Pharmacy, Mona Campus, Jamaica.Methods:This investigation utilised a cross-sectional analysis on all prescriptions with more than one drug that were filled at the Health Centre Pharmacy between November 2012 and February 2013. Potential DDIs were identified using the online Drug Interactions Checker database of Drugs.com.Results:During the period of the study, a total of 2814 prescription… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings were significantly higher than those from the cardio-resuscitative Departments of the United States, where only the 20.5% of drug interactions are potentially dangerous when using an online checker Lexi-Interact and Micromedex interaction (Smithburger et al, 2012). Our data are comparable with those of Jamaica researchers, where the prevalence of potentially dangerous drug interactions in the University Medical Clinic was the 49.8%, when using an online checker Drug Interactions Checker database of Drugs.com (Kennedy-Dixon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our findings were significantly higher than those from the cardio-resuscitative Departments of the United States, where only the 20.5% of drug interactions are potentially dangerous when using an online checker Lexi-Interact and Micromedex interaction (Smithburger et al, 2012). Our data are comparable with those of Jamaica researchers, where the prevalence of potentially dangerous drug interactions in the University Medical Clinic was the 49.8%, when using an online checker Drug Interactions Checker database of Drugs.com (Kennedy-Dixon et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A prevalência de IMP em pacientes ambulatoriais relatada na literatura é de aproximadamente 50% 5 , podendo chegar a mais de 80% 6 . O número de medicamentos está associado à maior ocorrência de IMP [4][5][6] . Soma-se a esse achado o envelhecimento populacional, com o aumento do número de doenças crônicas e a necessidade de politerapia, estamos frente a um problema crescente de saúde pública.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A recent analysis of prescriptions issued to outpatients of a general hospital in China revealed that as many as 30.29% of them contained pDDI with C, D or X risk rating (of which category C stands for ‘monitor therapy,’ D – ‘consider therapy modification,’ and X – ‘avoid combination,’ respectively) ( Ren et al, 2020 ). Finally, among prescriptions filled at a university health center pharmacy in Jamaica, prevalence of pDDIs was 49.8% (of which 4.7% were classified as major, 80.8% as moderate and 14.5% as minor pDDIs) ( Kennedy-Dixon et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%