The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review

Abstract

Plain English summaryWith the growing movement to engage patients in research, questions are being asked about who is engaging patients and how they are being engaged. Internationally, research groups are supporting and funding patient-oriented research studies that engage patients in the identification of research priorities and the design, conduct and uptake of research. As we move forward, we need to know what meaningful patient engagement looks like, how it benefits research and clinical practice, and what are the barriers to patient engagement?We conducted a review of the published literature looking for trials that report engaging patients in the research. We included both randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative trials. We looked at these trials for important study characteristics, including how patients were engaged, to better understand the practices used in trials. Importantly, we also discuss the number of trials reporting patient engagement practices relative to all published trials. We found that very few trials report any patient engagement activities even though it is widely supported by many major funding organizations. The findings of our work will advance patient-oriented research by showing how patients can be engaged and by stressing that patient engagement practices need to be better reported.AbstractBackgroundPatient-Oriented Research (POR) is research informed by patients and is centred on what is of importance to them. A fundamental component of POR is that patients are included as an integral part of the research process from conception to dissemination and implementation, and by extension, across the research continuum from basic research to pragmatic trials [J Comp Eff Res 2012, 1:181–94, JAMA 2012, 307:1587–8]. Since POR’s inception, questions have been raised as to how best to achieve this goal.We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative trials that report engaging patients in their research. Our main goal was to describe the characteristics of published trials engaging patients in research, and to identify the extent of patient engagement activities reported in these trials.MethodsThe MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, Cinahl, PsycINFO, Cochrane Methodology Registry, and Pubmed were searched from May 2011 to June 16th, 2016. Title, abstract and full text screening of all reports were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted from included trials by one reviewer and verified by a second. All trials that report patient engagement for the purposes of research were included.ResultsOf the 9490 citations retrieved, 2777 were reviewed at full text, of which 23 trials were included. Out of the 23 trials, 17 were randomized control trials, and six were non-randomized comparative trials. The majority of these trials (83%, 19/23) originated in the United States and United Kingdom. The trials engaged a range of 2-24 patients/ community representatives per study. Engagement of children and minorities occurred in 13% (3/23)...

Participant Engagement in Translational Genomics Research: Respect for Persons—and Then Some

“…In addition, CBPR principles and methods can inform PCOR designs. 6 Indeed, it is worth noting that, in the year after we began this study, a number of publications appeared that describe the scope, benefits, and challenges of patient engagement in health research. 7 This suggests that more health researchers are moving away from a "participants as subjects" standpoint to the practice of approaching participants as key stakeholders in clinical and health systems research, and these approaches may be informed by both PCOR and CBPR.…”

“…The CBPR model involves researchers working with members of the relevant communities to identify research questions and develop the research design and also involves practices that treat research participants as experts and partners. In addition, CBPR principles and methods can inform PCOR designs 6 . Indeed, it is worth noting that, in the year after we began this study, a number of publications appeared that describe the scope, benefits, and challenges of patient engagement in health research 7 .…”

Patient engagement with the BJD : why and how?

“…Thus, there are many agencies and organizations created to support patient engagement with research. However, a recent systematic review on patient engagement with research found only 23 studies in all medical specialities in which the authors have reported patient engagement occurring at some stage in their research . This highlights the gap between aspiration and reality for patient engagement in research.…”

Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN

“…Much of the literature to date has focused on stakeholder engagement in specific tasks such as the development of research agendas or on the involvement of patients and other stakeholders across the phases of discreet CER and PCOR studies . However, effectively engaging stakeholders in the development and oversight of research infrastructure, as required for PCORnet, brings both distinct challenges and corresponding opportunities.…”

“…[6][7][8] Much of the literature to date has focused on stakeholder engagement in specific tasks such as the development of research agendas [9][10][11][12][13] or on the involvement of patients and other stakeholders across the phases of discreet CER and PCOR studies. [14][15][16][17] However, effectively engaging stakeholders in the development and oversight of research infrastructure, as required for PCORnet, brings both distinct challenges and corresponding opportunities. In this paper, we describe the process of establishing a Patient and Community Advisory Committee that ensure strict adherence to standards of data security, patient privacy, and research ethics.…”