2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of smoking among pregnant and postpartum women in Israel: a national survey and review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 In line with these recent studies, the prevalence of smoking in the present study was 16.5%. However, the prevalence of smoking found in the present study was lower than in other studies on Turkish women, including 18% among 499 pregnant women 11 or 23% among 256 women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…23 In line with these recent studies, the prevalence of smoking in the present study was 16.5%. However, the prevalence of smoking found in the present study was lower than in other studies on Turkish women, including 18% among 499 pregnant women 11 or 23% among 256 women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specific factors of smoking behaviour and addiction: Besides the partner's smoking behaviour, the degree of tobacco addiction is also an important factor. Specific factors of dependence such as quantitative consumption [22,25,27,28,30,32,35], symptoms of craving [29] and withdrawal [29], as well as the Fagerström test [29] all lead to the same conclusion: The higher the degree of addiction, the more difficult it is for women to quit smoking during pregnancy. The price of cigarettes does not play a significant role, as a major American study showed [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The key characteristics of the identified studies are summarised in Table 1 [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. As can be seen, the included studies differed substantially with regard to their study design, for example, in terms of the period surveyed, sample size, age range and statistical methods ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 40 observational studies, 19 were cross‐sectional and 21 were cohort studies . Fifteen studies used secondary data from RCTs .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%