2021
DOI: 10.1080/10293523.2021.1898744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pricing of skewness: Evidence from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differential return is positive, and the high-COSKEW portfolio outperforms the low-COSKEW portfolio by 0.48% (t-stat = 3.03) per month. These findings contradict the evidence of Harvey and Siddique (2000), who argue that co-skewness negatively predicts expected returns, though it matches evidence from certain emerging markets (see, e.g., Steyn and Theart, 2021). Moreover, the co-skewness results are not unique as previous studies have found opposite signs in the Fama and French factors as well.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…The differential return is positive, and the high-COSKEW portfolio outperforms the low-COSKEW portfolio by 0.48% (t-stat = 3.03) per month. These findings contradict the evidence of Harvey and Siddique (2000), who argue that co-skewness negatively predicts expected returns, though it matches evidence from certain emerging markets (see, e.g., Steyn and Theart, 2021). Moreover, the co-skewness results are not unique as previous studies have found opposite signs in the Fama and French factors as well.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 88%