2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3156609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Principle of the Presumption of Innocence and Its Challenges in the Ethiopian Criminal Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other missions such as detecting threats to the national economy and development; serious problems of good governance and conspiracies; providing nationality and immigration service to Ethiopians alongside monitoring services to refugees; licensing and issuing security clearance for private security organisations; and overseeing the issuance of the national identity card are also singlehandedly undertaken by this institution (Ibid, Art. 8 (1,4) and Art. 9 (1, 2, 4,5,6 and 11).…”
Section: Powers and Duties: Merging Irreconcilable Operations?mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other missions such as detecting threats to the national economy and development; serious problems of good governance and conspiracies; providing nationality and immigration service to Ethiopians alongside monitoring services to refugees; licensing and issuing security clearance for private security organisations; and overseeing the issuance of the national identity card are also singlehandedly undertaken by this institution (Ibid, Art. 8 (1,4) and Art. 9 (1, 2, 4,5,6 and 11).…”
Section: Powers and Duties: Merging Irreconcilable Operations?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the part of the judiciarylet alone in the presence of such a legislative restriction on its inherent power of probing the commendable value of evidences submitted to it, plus, the politically sensitive nature of cases on terrorismthere seems to have inconsistency and lack of well-articulated judicial precedence in its interpretational jurisprudence on matters relating to evidence even on matters relating to ordinary crimes (Assefa, 2012). The judicial understanding of the doctrine of 'proof beyond reasonable doubt', as a standard of proof in the criminal litigations may be cited as a typical illustration of this aspect.…”
Section: Oversight and Accountability Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Special Investigative Techniques For Human Trafficking Investigation In Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 2(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.36923/ijsser.2020.2.1.03 standard for summon, the arrest of the suspect, duty to inform the right to remain silent, brought before a court within 48 hours, due process of law the right to pre-trial access to evidence, open court trial and presumption of innocence and by imposing certain burdens and obligations on the public prosecutor, such as the constitutional obligation to respect and have respected the rights and privileges of the accused, the requirement to prove the charge and to prove it beyond reasonable doubt degree, using third-degree methods are prohibited (Assefa, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…909/2015, article 2. It is ground of penalty aggravation and the FDRE criminal code articles 32-40, which deals degree of participation in the commission of the crime as principal and secondary (Assefa, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%