2002
DOI: 10.1109/51.993193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The principles of software QRS detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
553
0
11

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,075 publications
(570 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
6
553
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…These are very high results and indicate that our approach is well suited for QRS detection. Indeed, our results are competitive, and sometimes better, to those obtained by many other researchers in this area [11] even having used much simpler pre-and post-processing algorithms. In particular our approach yields a consistently lower gap between the sensitivity and precision performance where many researchers obtain differences of ≈ 1%.…”
Section: F Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…These are very high results and indicate that our approach is well suited for QRS detection. Indeed, our results are competitive, and sometimes better, to those obtained by many other researchers in this area [11] even having used much simpler pre-and post-processing algorithms. In particular our approach yields a consistently lower gap between the sensitivity and precision performance where many researchers obtain differences of ≈ 1%.…”
Section: F Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…(17). By this method, each element of t IPG ( j) which was detected by the algorithm could be assigned to the according t PPG (i).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detector algorithms can be based on heuristic derivative equations that identify discrete measurements or adaptive thresholds, for example, the increasing edge of the R-peak (Bonner et al, 1972;Pryor et al, 1969). Alternatively, they can be based on complex statistical algorithms that use linear or nonlinear filters, different transformations, or discriminant function analysis (Köhler et al, 2003;Pan and Tompkins, 1985;Romhilt and Estes, 1968). Interpolation algorithms, to replace missing or abnormal heart period series, include proximal, piecewise cubic Hermite, non-linear predictive interpolation, linear, and cubic spline interpolations (Kim et al, 2009;Lippman et al, 1994;Malik and Camm, 1995).…”
Section: Heart Rate Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%