1989
DOI: 10.1038/eye.1989.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prism bar—Prentice and frontal positions

Abstract: The prism cover test has been in use for many years for measuring ocular alignment. The measurements obtained are used for both calculating the amount of correction needed in strabismus surgery, and monitoring any change in ocular alignment with recovery from muscle imbalance. Variability may arise from its use in either the frontal position or the Prentice position. Most prism bars used in the United Kingdom are calibrated for use in the Prentice position. Inaccurate results arise when a prism bar is used in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement errors in the use of optical prisms were pointed out [1][2][3][4][6][7][8][9]. However, there is no solution to this issue, and attention has not been paid to the issue since the glass prims are still widely used in some countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement errors in the use of optical prisms were pointed out [1][2][3][4][6][7][8][9]. However, there is no solution to this issue, and attention has not been paid to the issue since the glass prims are still widely used in some countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measurement deviation errors can be induced when a prism is not held at a calibrated position. This problem was pointed out long time ago and all authors focused on theoretical calculation [1][2][3]. Authors in a recent review paper summarized the issues related to this problem [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each prism cover test (PCT) was repeated and if the measurements were inconsistent, the mean of the two values was then recorded. 11–13 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each prism cover test (PCT) was repeated and if the measurements were inconsistent, the mean of the two values was then recorded. [11][12][13] Based on the best-corrected acuity of the amblyopic, eye mild amblyopia was classified as Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/25 -20/40, moderate as BCVA of 20/40 -20/100 and severe as BCVA of ≤20/100. Surgeries were performed by the same doctor, with the patient under general anaesthesia (patients ≤18 years of age) or local anaesthesia (patients ≥18 years of age).…”
Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional prism bar is frequently held in the frontal position rather than the correct Prentice position (Kaye et al 1989). This is termed the Prentice position, for which traditional prism bars are calibrated.…”
Section: Prism Cover Test (Figure 54)mentioning
confidence: 99%