The privacy of the dead

Abstract

There are increasing numbers of products and services offered by the Digital Afterlife Industry that raise complicated questions about human dignity and the digital component of death. In most societies, we have refined moral and legal norms for how to treat someone's remains showing respect for the person to whom it belonged. However, such norms are mostly absent when the treatment concerns someone's digital remains. In particular, the approach to privacy issues has not been established. In this chapter, we explore how Information Ethics, as proposed by Luciano Floridi, can offer a meaningful framework to better understand the nature and importance of someone's 'informational body' . We will argue that Information Ethics as patient-oriented, ontocentric and e-nvironmental macro-ethics will lead to a radical rethinking of how to contribute to the realisation of human dignity in the digital afterlife. We briefly conclude with some thoughts on what this would mean for business ethics and law-making.

Information science and the inevitable: A literature review at the intersection of death and information management: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

“…Such works thus consider the obligations that might consequently arise, for example to preserve the information of the deceased. Bruneault et al (2023) provide a useful summary of such works, introduce the theoretical framework motivating them (Floridi's information ethics), and explain why that framework might imply such obligations. In short, people (and other entities) are not only constituted of biological matter but also of information (i.e.…”