\s=b\The purpose of this study was to investigate the analgesic effect of lidocaine hydrochloride applied with and without iontophoresis on the human tympanic membrane. Pain thresholds were measured in 20 normal ears using a dc stimulus applied directly to the tympanic membrane with an isolated floating electrode. There was a significant rise in pain threshold with lidocaine both with and without iontophoresis, but the total anesthetic effect on the tympanic membrane was inadequate and unpredictable. Our findings are contrasted with those of other investigators. (Arch Otolaryngol 1982;108:201-203) Asimple noninvasive technique for tympanic membrane anes¬ thesia for minor surgery, eg, myrin¬ gotomy, in the outpatient clinic set¬ ting remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effi¬ cacy of lidocaine hydrochloride, ap¬ plied with and without iontophoresis, in achieving adequate tympanic mem¬ brane (TM) anesthesia as reported by other investigators.13 Iontophoresis is a procedure in which charged mole¬ cules or ions are induced to migrate through tissues under the influence of a direct electrical current.
SUBJECTS AND METHODSTympanic membrane pain thresholds were investigated in 20 otoscopically nor¬ mal ears in 14 adult volunteers. All had normal hearing and normal tympanograms. An additional three patients with otosclerosis were also studied both before and after lidocaine infiltration of the pos¬ terior canal wall.Subjects were placed in a recumbent position with the head turned sideways so that the TM was horizontal. A small quan¬ tity of normal saline (0.2 to 0.3 mL) was placed over the TM to allow correct place¬ ment of the floating electrode (Fig 1), which was carefully positioned with the otomicroscope. The amount of saline was varied slightly to permit correct placement in each subject. The electrode wire passed through the low-density insulating materi¬ al ("the float") so that the only active, exposed part of the electrode was that placed against the TM (Fig 1). A constant current source was used to provide a 0.2-ms, 500-Hz dc-impulse stimuli. Current intensity was increased from zero, and the threshold was recorded in milliamperes when the subject indicated pain in the ear.The normative investigation was re¬ peated four times-once to familiarize the subject with the aural sensations and the following three times to obtain the mean pain thresholds given in the Table. The saline overlying the TM was then removed and replaced with an equal quantity of 5% lidocaine hydrochloride with 0.05% epinephrine hydrochloride. Pain thresholds (t) were measured and recorded immedi¬ ately after substitution with lidocaine (tO) and 20 minutes later (t20). The floating electrode was then removed, and the ear canal was filled with 5% lidocaine hydro¬ chloride and 0.05% epinephrine hydrochlo¬ ride. Iontophoresis was performed with an ionesthetizer that delivered a current of 0.5 mamp for ten minutes. The ear canal was then emptied by suction, and the same amount of normal saline as originally insert...