In fraud, deception is considered as the essence of the offence. Authorities favour to address not all sorts of deceptive conduct within the cover of criminal law, but only some fraudulent and deceptive actions with specified qualities, according to Turkish law consensus and practice of Turkish law instruction. In other words, the perpetrator's deceptive action must attain a certain degree in order to constitute a fraudulent offense. However, attempting to achieve a certain level or scope of deception, which is the main component of fraud crime, will entail introducing a new element to legal practices that the law does not anticipate in terms of fraudulent offences. If a false statement has deceived someone, it is called deception, and no assessment are required to be made as to whether the mentioned false statement is fit for deception or not, or whether it has reached a certain level. The distinction between private law fraud and criminal law fraud is one way to exclude abstract false statements and deceptive actions that do not attain a certain level within the bounds of criminal law; the other is the acceptance of the victim purposefully making a mistake in the case, in other words, that he or she committed an action voluntarily without the effect of the deception. It would be wise that the victims should be required to prove that they were deceived by an obvious deceptive action, just as the perpetrators are required to prove their innocence.