2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Process-Interaction-Model: a common representation of rule-based and logical models allows studying signal transduction on different levels of detail

Abstract: BackgroundSignaling systems typically involve large, structured molecules each consisting of a large number of subunits called molecule domains. In modeling such systems these domains can be considered as the main players. In order to handle the resulting combinatorial complexity, rule-based modeling has been established as the tool of choice. In contrast to the detailed quantitative rule-based modeling, qualitative modeling approaches like logical modeling rely solely on the network structure and are particul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible tool extension might exploit a new, recently developed ProMoT feature: the Process Interaction Model [50] (PIM) concept that gives a compact specification of a rule-based model and has been applied to the modeling of signaling pathways. This could lead to a fully rule-based, modular design of synthetic signaling networks, from the receptor membrane proteins down to the genes regulated in the nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible tool extension might exploit a new, recently developed ProMoT feature: the Process Interaction Model [50] (PIM) concept that gives a compact specification of a rule-based model and has been applied to the modeling of signaling pathways. This could lead to a fully rule-based, modular design of synthetic signaling networks, from the receptor membrane proteins down to the genes regulated in the nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is implemented and simulated in the classical synchronous Boolean fashion, but retaining the exact network structure of the rxncon input. In this regard, our method goes into a similar direction as the recently published site-specific logical models proposed by [9]. However, it does not require parameterisation whereas the site-specific logical models require threshold parameters on top of a fully parameterised rule based model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…they describe functionality at the component level, not at the level of states, which is insufficient to describe the often context dependent activity of signal transduction components. To our knowledge, only three methods have been developed for mechanistic Boolean simulation of signal transduction networks: One derived from SBGN-PD diagrams, one from rule-based models, and one bipartite Boolean modelling (bBM) method based on the rxncon language [12][13][14] . These can all be used for detailed description of signalling events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can all be used for detailed description of signalling events. However, the first is based on microstate description, inheriting the scalability issues of these approaches 12 ; the second requires a full parametrised rulebased model, inheriting the problem of parametrisation 13 ; and the third inherited shortcomings in expressiveness and precision from the first generation of the rxncon language 14 . However, the bBM method was successfully used for validation and gap-filling of large signal transduction models 14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%