1993
DOI: 10.7870/cjcmh-1993-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Process of Empowerment: Implications for Theory and Practice

Abstract: This article describes a research study completed on the process of empowerment. Conducted with 55 men and women who had experienced extensive powerlessness in their lives, qualitative interviews and focus groups were designed to understand participants' lived experiences as they struggled toward increased control in their lives. Several themes were identified, including elements which provided an impetus for empowerment and the importance of support from people. As the empowerment process unfolded, access to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
158
0
21

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
158
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Ce processus repose sur plusieurs éléments présents dans une communauté tels que la participation, les compétences, la communication et le capital communautaire (Ninacs, 2003 (Zimmerman, 1990), de prise de conscience (Kieffer, 1984) et de motivation à l'action sociale (Rappaport, 1987;Anderson, 1991) (Fahlbberg et al, 1991;Ninacs, 2003;Tones, 1996;Wallerstein & Bernstein, 1992). À ce sujet, Aujoulat (2007: 16) (Fawcett et al, 1995;Lord & Hutchison, 1993).…”
Section: Les Dimensions De L'autonomisationunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ce processus repose sur plusieurs éléments présents dans une communauté tels que la participation, les compétences, la communication et le capital communautaire (Ninacs, 2003 (Zimmerman, 1990), de prise de conscience (Kieffer, 1984) et de motivation à l'action sociale (Rappaport, 1987;Anderson, 1991) (Fahlbberg et al, 1991;Ninacs, 2003;Tones, 1996;Wallerstein & Bernstein, 1992). À ce sujet, Aujoulat (2007: 16) (Fawcett et al, 1995;Lord & Hutchison, 1993).…”
Section: Les Dimensions De L'autonomisationunclassified
“…À l'inverse, les facteurs de risque sont ceux qui, selon Grizenko & Fisher (1992), augmentent la vulnérabilité de l'individu ou encore la probabilité qu'il présente des difficultés d'adaptation dans des situations de stress. Ainsi, le fait d'avoir accès à un environnement social ou un soutien social de mauvaise qualité peut inhiber le processus individuel d'autonomisation et maintenir la personne dans un état de besoin constant (Fawcett et al, 1995;Lord & Hutchison, 1993).…”
Section: Perception Des Participantes En Fonction Des Types Et De La unclassified
“…Finally, it is called continuing the process of empowerment through self-sustainable improving capability to be able to adjust in dynamic changing circumstances (Sumodiningrat, 1999). Moreover, the study of Lord and Hutchison (1993) found that the interdependence relationship during empowerment process can be seen as an important part how the member of community relates each other. The result showed that the empowerment process much more powerful if there is mutual interaction of individuals within the community.…”
Section: Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study of the empowerment process, Lord & Hutchison (1993) define one of its components, selfefficacy as: "People's evaluation of their capabilities to organize and carry out activities required to attain personal goals... In this sense, positive self-efficacy is seen as fostering confidence in ways that enhance participation and taking initiative" (p. 13).…”
Section: Self-efficacy and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important dimension of an empowerment process is its culmination in action that benefits individuals, a group or the community (Lord & Hutchison, 1993;Zimmerman et al, 1992). Since PE is generally time consuming and work intensive, it would be disempowering for participants to contribute so many hours to a process that was not ultimately useful on an individual or organizational level.…”
Section: Evaluation Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%