2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315724003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Production and Consumption of Music in the Digital Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research in this area is timely given the, for decades now, repeatedly cited ‘crisis’ regarding a sharp decline not only in music criticism but in all form of art journalism ( Boenisch, 2008 ; Kristensen, 2010 ; Caduff, 2014 ; Jaakkola, 2015 ; Heikkilö et al, 2017 ; Melnyk, 2019 ; Widholm et al, 2021 ) and, not least, also due to the new music consumption behaviors and peer-communication channels in the digital age ( Varriale, 2012 ; Hracs et al 2016 ; Baldassarre and Alessandri, 2022 ). Digital technologies have revolutionized the way we listen to and discuss music, giving artists more direct access to their audiences, creating platforms for peer-opinion, and empowering listeners with new means and resources to facilitate decision making with regards to purchasing and listening ( Carboni, 2012 ; Datta et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in this area is timely given the, for decades now, repeatedly cited ‘crisis’ regarding a sharp decline not only in music criticism but in all form of art journalism ( Boenisch, 2008 ; Kristensen, 2010 ; Caduff, 2014 ; Jaakkola, 2015 ; Heikkilö et al, 2017 ; Melnyk, 2019 ; Widholm et al, 2021 ) and, not least, also due to the new music consumption behaviors and peer-communication channels in the digital age ( Varriale, 2012 ; Hracs et al 2016 ; Baldassarre and Alessandri, 2022 ). Digital technologies have revolutionized the way we listen to and discuss music, giving artists more direct access to their audiences, creating platforms for peer-opinion, and empowering listeners with new means and resources to facilitate decision making with regards to purchasing and listening ( Carboni, 2012 ; Datta et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inexpensive computers, software and equipment have democratized the production of music by allowing recording, editing, mixing and mastering to be performed in home studios instead of capital-intensive recording studios (Watson, 2014). Digital technologies and online retail spaces have also allowed musicians to enter the world of marketing, fundraising and distribution for the first time (Hracs et al, 2016;Langley and Leyshon, 2017). This resulted in declining entry barriers, the profusion of independent music production and a wave of disintermediation which allowed consumers to circumvent traditional producers, curators and distributors and to get directly involved through co-creation and co-promotion (Hracs et al, 2013;Lange and Bu¨rkner, 2013;Potts et al, 2008;Winter, 2012).…”
Section: The Case Of Music and The Evolving Role Of Music Curatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing the activities that were not addressed, we put the remaining terms into five categories which we developed based on the explanations and examples given by our respondents and our wider knowledge of the music marketplace (Hracs et al 2016). This process allowed us to develop a better understanding of how, why and where curation-related activities are practiced and understood within our sample.…”
Section: 'What' Is Curation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New and often relatively unknown fashion designers also struggle to gain support early in their career. Many had the impression that fashion, similar to industries like music (Hracs ), funding is more likely to go established acts with a clear track record and reputation.…”
Section: Level 5: Policy Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%