0Marxist theory gains its critical capacity by presenting itselfas in the process of being realized through class conflict. By locating its criticalandempirical reality in a ideal, unrepressive. unoppressive. relatively crime free future. it renders itself irresponsible for its own history and immune from empirical criticism. In order to sustain this vision in theabsence of historicalevidence. the chiefpromoters of a Marxist perspective in American criminology have found it necessary to invent untestabk and irrefutable concepts whose principal function is to maintain a suspension of the relationship between history, social reality, and theory. Because such work is more akin to religious phophesy than criminology. it presently appears to be irreconcilable with all heretofore accepted standards of academic scholarship.History does nothing, possesses no enormous wealth, fights no battles. It is rather man, the real, living man, who does everything, possesses, fights. It is not "History," as if she were a person apart, who uses men as means to work out her purposes, but history itself is nothing but the activity of men pursuing their purposes.
--Karl MarxThe task of framing a critique of radical criminology is formidable. During the past decade a number of new criminologies have appeared. Some of the best (Lofland, 1969, for example) fall well within the tradition of conventional criminology, though are profoundly critical of it. Others have taken up the helpful cultivation of sophisticated methodological, cross-cultural, and historical studies, and still others have brought to criminology needed exchange with the disciplines of economics, psychology, philosophy, and political science.