2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prognosis of Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Stratified by HER2 Status

Abstract: Single estrogen receptor (ER)+ and progesterone receptor (PR)+ tumors account for about10% of all breast cancers. However, the prognosis of these single hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumor remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of single HR+ breast tumors according to HER2 status in order to improve the treatment of patients with single HR+. Patients from the SEER program (2010-2016) were divided into ER+PR-, ER-PR+, ER+PR+ and ER-PR- molecular subtypes stratified by HER2 status. Overal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Beside triple-negative primary tumor, which is known to be the most aggressive, PR-positive primary breast carcinoma, shows more aggressive features in comparison to ER-positive carcinoma. [31][32][33][34] Research shows that this, as well, is the case with SM, and the signi cance of this study is that it provides prognostic data useful for possible early surgical treatment and fracture prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Beside triple-negative primary tumor, which is known to be the most aggressive, PR-positive primary breast carcinoma, shows more aggressive features in comparison to ER-positive carcinoma. [31][32][33][34] Research shows that this, as well, is the case with SM, and the signi cance of this study is that it provides prognostic data useful for possible early surgical treatment and fracture prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The influence of receptor status on patient survival after pathological fracture and the outcome of surgical treatment are also well documented. Triple‐negative tumors (PR/ER/HER2) are the most aggressive, whilst PR‐positive primary breast cancer shows more aggressive features in comparison to ER‐positive lesions 27,28 . Since PR and ER regulate each other's expression, various combinations of these receptors and HER2 receptor differ in their prognosis, with single PR+ (ER−) and HER2− patients having poorer prognosis than PR+ and ER+, also than single ER+ (PR−) in same HER2− subtype 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triple-negative tumors (PR/ER/HER2) are the most aggressive, whilst PR-positive primary breast cancer shows more aggressive features in comparison to ER-positive lesions. 27,28 Since PR and ER regulate each other's expression, various combinations of these receptors and HER2 receptor differ in their prognosis, with single PR+ (ERÀ) and HER2À patients having poorer prognosis than PR+ and ER+, also than single ER+ (PRÀ) in same HER2À subtype. 29 Although various national and international guidelines exist as to the management of early and metastatic breast cancer, to the best of our knowledge, none of these guidelines provides any guidance as to how the receptor status of the SMs of these patients may help in the selection process by the orthopedic surgeon of the patients who are at high risk of pathological fractures and therefore require bone fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…us, determining the site and status of breast tumor ER is vital to e ectively and successfully treat patients and ultimately improve outcomes and survival rates [12]. e results of the National Cancer Database and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program indicate that while single ER + or PR + tumor subtypes indicate a worse prognosis than ER+/PR + tumors, ER−/PR + tumors exhibit a similar prognosis to that of the ER−/PR−subtype [14][15][16]. Furthermore, the ER and PR status may change during the development and treatment of breast cancer [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%