1993
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90876-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proportion of amphiphilic choline acetyltransferase inDrosophila melanogaster is higher than in rat orTorpedo and is developmentally regulated

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of enzyme that is membrane-bound appears to vary between species and at different stages of development (14,15). The means by which ChAT binds nonionically to membranes has not been elucidated; it does not have obvious hydrophobic domains for association with the lipid bilayer, and the presence of covalent modifications such as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol linkage have been controversial (16 -18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of enzyme that is membrane-bound appears to vary between species and at different stages of development (14,15). The means by which ChAT binds nonionically to membranes has not been elucidated; it does not have obvious hydrophobic domains for association with the lipid bilayer, and the presence of covalent modifications such as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol linkage have been controversial (16 -18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This association partly depends on a reversible binding that changes according to the ionic milieu (Fonnum, 1968;Fonnum and Malthe-Sørenssen, 1973) and might be controlled by the phosphorylation state of ChAT (Bruce and Hersh, 1989;Schmidt and Rylett, 1993a). Also, a fraction of cellular ChAT is now considered membranous (see, e.g., Smith and Carroll, 1980;Eder-Colli and Amato, 1985;Peng et al, 1986;Salem et al, 1993;Schmidt and Rylett, 1993b); it may be inserted into membranes, removable by proteinase K (Eder-Colli et al, 1992), or held there by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol link (Carroll and Smith, 1990;Smith and Carroll, 1993). The microtubule-dependent transport of ChAT could result from one or both of these membrane associations.…”
Section: Maintenance Of Chat Activity In Nerve Terminalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have already shown that in the central nervous system of the fly D. melanogaster, ChAT activity exists in two molecular forms: a soluble hydrophilic form and a membrane-bound amphiphilic form (Salem et al, 1993). This was established by using sequential solubilization and Triton X-114 phase separation; a method that allows the separation of amphiphilic from hydrophilic proteins (Bordier, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%