Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), the enzyme which catalyses the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, exists in a soluble and membrane‐bound form in cholinergic nerve terminals of different animal species. This study was performed on the enzyme present in Drosophila central nervous system. We show that the two forms of the enzyme have the same apparent molecular weight (75 kDa) when analysed by immunoblotting using an antibody we raised against the recombinant enzyme. According to different authors, membrane‐bound enzyme might be associated with synaptic vesicles or plasma membrane. Subfractionation of Drosophila head homogenates in linear glycerol gradients showed that ChAT does not associate with synaptic vesicles. Analysis of ChAT activity and immunoreactivity showed that two peaks of ChAT were produced. One peak was present in fractions containing soluble components and the other was associated with rapidly sedimenting membranes containing plasma membranes. ChAT in the first peak was mainly hydrophilic. A large proportion of ChAT associated with rapidly sedimenting membranes was amphiphilic. Further fractionation of these membranes by flotation in sucrose gradients showed that membrane‐associated ChAT sedimented in fractions containing plasma membrane marker. Membrane‐bound ChAT was neither solubilized nor converted to hydrophilic enzyme after membrane treatment with 1 m hydroxylamine, suggesting that the enzyme is not palmitoylated and therefore not anchored to membrane through thioester‐linked long chain fatty acid. Partial solubilization of ChAT present on membranes with urea and carbonate suggests that this form of ChAT is a peripheral membrane protein. Carbonate solubilization of membrane‐bound ChAT converted the enzyme from hydrophobic to hydrophilic protein.

We have previously shown that the enzyme choline-O-acetyltransferase (ChAT) exists in a hydrophilic and an amphiphilic form in Drosophila head. A complementary DNA clone of 4.2 kb containing the entire coding region of ChAT was isolated from a cDNA library of Drosophila heads. The cDNA was subcloned in an expression vector and injected into the nucleus of Xenopus oocytes. Injected oocytes expressed high levels of ChAT activity. This activity was inhibited by bromoacetylcholine, a specific inhibitor of the enzyme. In the present study the non-ionic detergent Triton X-114 was used to analyse whether the expression of hydrophilic and amphiphilic ChAT was or was not directed by a single cDNA. The two forms of ChAT were found to be synthesized in injected oocytes. Approximately 9% of the recombinant enzyme partitioned as amphiphilic activity. This value was similar to that found for native amphiphilic ChAT in Drosophila heads. Sedimentation in sucrose gradients of amphiphilic enzyme was found to be influenced by the type of detergent present in the gradient whereas this was not the case for hydrophilic ChAT. Hydrophilic and amphiphilic enzyme activities differed in some of their biochemical properties. Amphiphilic ChAT was less sensitive to inhibition by the product acetylcholine than was hydrophilic ChAT. Moreover, amphiphilic ChAT was found to be more resistant than hydrophilic ChAT to heat inactivation at 45 degrees C. These properties were observed for the native as well as for recombinant ChAT. These results demonstrate that the hydrophilic and amphiphilic forms of ChAT are derived from one mRNA.

No abstract