The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock

Abstract

Social interactions between individuals living in a group can have both positive and negative effects on welfare, productivity, and health of these individuals. Negative effects of social interactions in livestock are easier to observe than positive effects. For example, laying hens may develop feather pecking, which can cause mortality due to cannibalism, and pigs may develop tail biting or excessive aggression. Several studies have shown that social interactions affect the genetic variation in a trait. Genetic improvement of socially-affected traits, however, has proven to be difficult until relatively recently. The use of classical selection methods, like individual selection, may result in selection responses opposite to expected, because these methods neglect the effect of an individual on its group mates (social genetic effects). It has become clear that improvement of socially-affected traits requires selection methods that take into account not only the direct effect of an individual on its own phenotype but also the social genetic effects, also known as indirect genetic effects, of an individual on the phenotypes of its group mates. Here, we review the theoretical and empirical work on social genetic effects, with a focus on livestock. First, we present the theory of social genetic effects. Subsequently, we evaluate the evidence for social genetic effects in livestock and other species, by reviewing estimates of genetic parameters for direct and social genetic effects. Then we describe the results of different selection experiments. Finally, we discuss issues concerning the implementation of social genetic effects in livestock breeding programs. This review demonstrates that selection for socially-affected traits, using methods that target both the direct and social genetic effects, is a promising, but sometimes difficult to use in practice, tool to simultaneously improve production and welfare in livestock.

Prediction of reduction in aggressive behaviour of growing pigs using skin lesion traits as selection criteria

“…Where there is a negative correlation between direct and social genetic effects, selection based on direct breeding values alone can result in an undesirable result (e.g. selecting for reduced SL24h could theoretically result in increased aggression; Ellen et al, 2014). Previous studies suggest a positive correlation between direct and social effects for aggressive behaviour, meaning that animals with a low genetic propensity to become involved in aggression also have a low chance of being attacked (Wilson et al, 2011;Alemu et al, 2014).…”

Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable?

“…Two major sources of change, both of which are capable of radically altering the relationship between welfare and efficiency, are genetics and the technological control of animal environments. For example, selective breeding of animals with high welfare traits such as disease resistance (Zwald et al 2004), better walking ability (Chapinal et al 2012) and reduced tendency to peck the feathers or bite the tails of other individuals (Sinisalo et al 2012;Ellen et al 2014;Grams et al 2015) can directly improve both the efficiency and the welfare of a system (Grandin and Deesing 2014). Similarly, precision livestock farming that involves assessment and control of many aspects of animal lives (Rutter 2012;Berckmans 2014;Bocquier et al 2014) may revolutionise the industry of the future and alter the balance between welfare and efficiency as we see it today.…”

An evolutionary ecology perspective to address forest pathology challenges of today and tomorrow

“…An application of this concept for resistance traits was recently proposed by Anche et al (2014), who investigated the use the basic reproduction ratio, R0, which is a key epidemiological parameter defined at the population level, in breeding programs using individual assessments. The theoretical basis of breeding strategies targeting population traits, i.e., an association of "cooperative phenotypes," has been developed and applied with success in animals and cereals (Ellen et al 2014;Carroll et al 2014). Recently initiated tree species diversity experiments have allowed for the testing of associational effects (those linked to interactions between species) on traits including disease resistance and susceptibility (Castagneyrol et al 2014;Hantsch et al 2013Hantsch et al , 2014.…”