Recently, the right to environment or the right to live in a healthy and bal-anced environment is more frequently discussed in the context of increasing environmental problems and their impact on other fundamental rights and freedoms. In this respect, the direct protection of right to environment before judicial authorities poses an important legal problem. The right to live in a healthy and balanced environment, recognized in Article 56 of the Turkish Constitution. However, since the individual application in Turkish law is only accepted in terms of the common rights in the Constitution and the ECtHR, this right cannot be directly subjected to individual application. Nevertheless, in line with the ECtHR case law, the Constitutional Court accepst applications originating from environmental issues by including them within the scope of other fundamental rights protected by the Convention. These applications are mostly evaluated within the scope of the right to respect for private life, the right to a fair trial and the right to property. In this study the decisions of the Constitutional Court upon individual applications about environmental problems have been examined and criticized in the light of its existing case law.