The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion.

Abstract

Several independent lines of research bear on the question of why individuals avoid decisions by postponing them, failing to act, or accepting the status quo. This review relates findings across several different disciplines and uncovers 4 decision avoidance effects that offer insight into this common but troubling behavior: choice deferral, status quo bias, omission bias, and inaction inertia. These findings are related by common antecedents and consequences in a rational-emotional model of the factors that predispose humans to do nothing. Prominent components of the model include cost-benefit calculations, anticipated regret, and selection difficulty. Other factors affecting decision avoidance through these key components, such as anticipatory negative emotions, decision strategies, counterfactual thinking, and preference uncertainty, are also discussed.

Decisional procrastination of school-to-work transition: Personality correlates of career indecision

“…Indecisiveness is the most basic form of self-regulation when faced with a real or potential threat of discontinuation of identity in ambiguous situations, because it can be narrowed down to the psychology of doing nothing (Anderson, 2003). In this context, doing nothing does not necessarily have only negative connotations, but fits a certain life philosophy, which can be summed up in the words "make haste slowly".…”

The demand for health insurance and behavioural economics

“…1,2 1 Note that, if insured want coverage for healthcare services not covered by BHI, their only option is the current SHI since no better alternative SHI policies are offered at the Dutch SHI market. One could question why insurers do not offer alternative SHI policies that are more in line with traditional economics.…”

“…Decision avoidance implies a tendency to avoid making a choice by postponing it or by seeking an easy way out that involves no action or no change [1]. Several underlying factors could contribute to decision avoidance.…”

Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: The case of penalty kicks

“…Kahneman and Tversky (1982), in a seminal article, found that people feel a more poignant emotional reaction to bad outcomes that result from action relative to otherwise identical outcomes that result from inaction. 1 The different emotional reaction to outcomes depending on whether they come from action or inaction was later replicated in many other studies (see for example Landman, 1987;Ritov and Baron, 1990, 1992Kordes-de Vaal, 1996;Patt and Zeckhauser, 2000;Kruger, Wirtz and Miller, 2005), and was referred to in the literature in several terms, including emotional amplification, the action bias, the action effect, the inaction effect, the actor effect, and the omission bias (for a detailed review of this literature, see Anderson, 2003). Kahneman and Miller (1986) proposed the norm theory to explain the above phenomenon.…”