Nietzsche’s Psychology of Ressentiment 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315192222-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Psychology of Ressentiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This argument indicates a special interest from the hierarchy to protect and take sides with superpower people. In line with it, it is also mentioned by Elgat (2017) from his interpretation of Nitzsche's opinion about the equality of power that justice can be achieved only when both sides are under equal compulsion. If one is stronger than the other, the weak must accept the consequence.…”
Section: Questioning Woman's Rights In Modern Societymentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This argument indicates a special interest from the hierarchy to protect and take sides with superpower people. In line with it, it is also mentioned by Elgat (2017) from his interpretation of Nitzsche's opinion about the equality of power that justice can be achieved only when both sides are under equal compulsion. If one is stronger than the other, the weak must accept the consequence.…”
Section: Questioning Woman's Rights In Modern Societymentioning
confidence: 81%
“…There is no longer an equal right for them in getting justice. Equality of power is thus a condition for the emergence of the whole sphere of justice (Elgat, 2017). This argument indicates a special interest from the hierarchy to protect and take sides with superpower people.…”
Section: Questioning Woman's Rights In Modern Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having initially accepted revenge as a means for self-preservation and defending honour in his most 'English' book, Human, All Too Human (2005[1878), Nietzsche soon polemicised against it, as it would legitimate anti-Semites and anarchists, among whom ressentiment blooms. The defence of ressentiment by Dühring is an attempt 'to sanctify revenge with the term justice' (Nietzsche, 2006a: II, 11;III, 14; see also Elgat, 2017). The main problem for Nietzsche is not the risk of infinitisation inherent to revenge or the lex talionis, as it was for Smith and Butler.…”
Section: The Problems Of Rationality and Authenticitymentioning
confidence: 99%