2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2003.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The public accountability index: crafting a parametric disclosure index for annual reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
185
2
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
185
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We used multiple regression (Cohen et al, 2013) to test our model. Each item in the model was given equal weight because there is no document showing that any item has more of an effect than another.…”
Section: Regression Equation Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used multiple regression (Cohen et al, 2013) to test our model. Each item in the model was given equal weight because there is no document showing that any item has more of an effect than another.…”
Section: Regression Equation Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many studies have shown that the failure in accounting standards is caused by numerous problems in the implementation process (Christiaens & Rommel, 2008). Accordingly, several hypotheses have been formulated to determine the reasons for the level of compliance in the public sector (Evans & Patton, 1983;Ingram, 1984;Robins & Austin, 1986;Evans & Patton, 1987;Giroux, 1989;Dixon et al, 1991;Cheng, 1992;Allen & Sanders, 1994;Pina & Torres, 1996;Coy et al, 1994;Coy & Dixon, 2002;Christiaens, 1999;Weets & Jegers, 2000;Giroux & McLelland, 2003;Christiaens & Vanhee, 2003;Da Costa Carvalho, et al, 2007;Verbruggen, 2011). Although these studies' investigations have resulted in valuable insights and interesting hypotheses, little has been produced with respect to emerging-country characteristics.…”
Section: XXmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been some considerable debate about the use of various weighting schemes, especially in terms of their subjectivity (Ahmed and Courtis, 1999;Coy and Dixon, 2004), it has generally been thought that providing the index is 'sufficiently' extensive, it makes little difference whether a weighted or un-weighted index is employed (Chow and Wong-Boren, 1987). However, even if this is the case, one problem with the use of disclosure indices remains.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coy and Dixon (2004) argue that stakeholders for schools should include feeder schools, suppliers, donors, sponsors, professional associations, unions, alumni, taxpayers, other community members, researchers, media and auditors. The definition of stakeholders by Jensen as well as Coy and Dixon does not include the government as the stakeholder.…”
Section: Accountability Of Sgbs To Stakeholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%