2020
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/myfxh
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The puzzle of the proton radius

Abstract: The radius of the proton is a topic of debate and has yet to be confirmed. Measurements from different techniques yield conflicting values, with some experimental methods yielding a value in disagreement with the standard model. This review article outlines the current status of the experimental results and summarizes the possible solutions to this puzzle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, can we all but rule out proton decay under certain circumstances (in inertial frames)? Today, the proton decay [239] and the proton radius [500] are still puzzles. [498], show that an (extremal) black hole model for the proton provides a good model for the proton magnetic moment (not depending on the coupling strength), and could explain the different radius estimates as measures of the two Kerr-Newman ergospheres (which depends on G but gain would have to be adjusted with the massive gravity changes vs. the spin (i.e., going to a Reissner-Nordström metric).…”
Section: Some Of the Baryon Mysteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, can we all but rule out proton decay under certain circumstances (in inertial frames)? Today, the proton decay [239] and the proton radius [500] are still puzzles. [498], show that an (extremal) black hole model for the proton provides a good model for the proton magnetic moment (not depending on the coupling strength), and could explain the different radius estimates as measures of the two Kerr-Newman ergospheres (which depends on G but gain would have to be adjusted with the massive gravity changes vs. the spin (i.e., going to a Reissner-Nordström metric).…”
Section: Some Of the Baryon Mysteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, can we all but rule out proton decay under certain circumstances? Today, the proton decay [501]and the proton radius [502] are still puzzles. [499], show that an (extremal) black hole model for the proton provides a good model for the proton magnetic moment (not depending of the coupling strength) and could explain the different radius estimates as measures of the two Kerr-Newman ergospheres (which depends on G but gain would have to be adjusted with the massive gravity changes vs. the spin (i.e.…”
Section: Some Of the Baryon Mysteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%