2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1970109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Puzzling Countercyclicality of the Value Premium: Empirics and a Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Campello et al (2008) estimate the expected value premium is countercyclical, corporate bond yields (a proxy for credit risk) does not matter. Montone (2012) comments that if the value stocks are countercyclical and provide insurance against real and financial shocks, thee should deliver lower risk-adjusted returns, which is obviously not true. Du (2011) shows that the value premium has little correlation with the Chicago Fed National Activity Index .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Campello et al (2008) estimate the expected value premium is countercyclical, corporate bond yields (a proxy for credit risk) does not matter. Montone (2012) comments that if the value stocks are countercyclical and provide insurance against real and financial shocks, thee should deliver lower risk-adjusted returns, which is obviously not true. Du (2011) shows that the value premium has little correlation with the Chicago Fed National Activity Index .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a The importance of both factors in asset pricing is extensively documented in the literature, for example size: Herrera and Lockwood (1994), Heston at al. (1999), , Horowitz et al 2000, Fama and French (1992, 2008, 2012, Michou et al (2010) and momentum: Jagadeesh and Titman (1993), Asness (1994), French (1998, 2012), Rouwenhorst (1998), Liew and Vassalou (2000), Griffin, Ji, and Martin (2003), Grinblatt and Moskowitz (2004), Chui, Wei, and Titman (2010), Asness, Moskowitz, and Pedersen (2013).…”
Section: Bloombergmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2008) wskazują, że premia za ryzyko jest antycykliczna, natomiast popularne wskaźniki ryzyka, jak choćby spready korporacyjne (zamiennik ryzyka kredytowego) nie mają większego znaczenia. Montone (2012) argumentuje, że jeżeli spółki wartościowe są antycykliczne i zapewniają zabezpieczenie przed szokami realnymi i finansowymi, to powinny przynosić niższe stopy zwrotu, a tak się jednak nie dzieje. Du (2011) pokazuje, że premia za ryzyko wykazuje negatywną korelację z Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI-MA3).…”
unclassified