1990
DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(90)90030-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quality of licensed technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
97
3
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
97
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For () E [0, ()*), it is optimal for the licenser to make a combination of positive per unit output royalty (except for () = 0) and positive up-front fixed fee in a patent licensing contract. Hence, this is in sharp contrast to the finding of previos work (see, e.g., Rockett, 1990 comes from the non-negativity constraint on fixed fee. Now, we look at the relationship between the threat of imitation and the degree of product differentiation.…”
Section: Proposition 22 It Is Always Optimal For Firm 1 To Sell Its contrasting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For () E [0, ()*), it is optimal for the licenser to make a combination of positive per unit output royalty (except for () = 0) and positive up-front fixed fee in a patent licensing contract. Hence, this is in sharp contrast to the finding of previos work (see, e.g., Rockett, 1990 comes from the non-negativity constraint on fixed fee. Now, we look at the relationship between the threat of imitation and the degree of product differentiation.…”
Section: Proposition 22 It Is Always Optimal For Firm 1 To Sell Its contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Since in this constrained situation the adjustment of rand F is similar to that of Rockett(1990), we choose to omit the discussion in detail here. 6Mukherjee and Marjit (1997) shows this in a situation with costless imitation.…”
Section: Implications Of Imitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations