1988
DOI: 10.1177/027507408801800205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality of Work Life in the Federal Bureaucracy: Conceptualization and Measurement

Abstract: This paper uses a dimensionalization approach to explore the complex meaning of the quality of work life in the federal bureaucracy. Based on the 1979-80 Federal Employees Attitudes Survey, five distinct dimensions are delineated: supervision, relations with co-workers, job task, relations among work groups and economic well-being. The policy implications of the findings are briefly discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the findings of a study by Huang et al, (2007) suggests that all dimension of QWL positively affects the commitment level shown by auditors in Taiwanese public accounting firms, which consequently affects the turnover intentions to a great extent. Moreover, it is believed that QWL enhances employee's self-esteem by providing them the basic facilities at work and redesigning the work to be humanised at the same time proving that each employee's contribution matters to the organization in achieving its goals (Walton, 1974;Carlson, 1980;Nachmias, 1988;Hian and Einstein, 1990). Similarly, studies have established a strong link of employee engagement with positive work outcomes (Chalofsky & Krishna, 2009).…”
Section: Linking Quality Of Work Life Organizational Commitment and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the findings of a study by Huang et al, (2007) suggests that all dimension of QWL positively affects the commitment level shown by auditors in Taiwanese public accounting firms, which consequently affects the turnover intentions to a great extent. Moreover, it is believed that QWL enhances employee's self-esteem by providing them the basic facilities at work and redesigning the work to be humanised at the same time proving that each employee's contribution matters to the organization in achieving its goals (Walton, 1974;Carlson, 1980;Nachmias, 1988;Hian and Einstein, 1990). Similarly, studies have established a strong link of employee engagement with positive work outcomes (Chalofsky & Krishna, 2009).…”
Section: Linking Quality Of Work Life Organizational Commitment and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have shown that a positive relationship between superiors and subordinates contributes to a greater degree of job satisfaction, reduces stress and improves business performance (Daley, 1986;Nachmias, 1988;Emmert & Taher, 1992;Martensen & Gronholdt, 2001;Eskildsen, Westlund, & Kristensen, 2004).…”
Section: Employee Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subordinates that have high-quality relationships with their supervisors will perceive their organisation as providing greater autonomy, decision-making latitude and supportiveness. Numerous studies have shown that positive relationship between supervisors and subordinates contribute to higher levels of job satisfaction, in turn reducing stress and improving job performance (Daley, 1986;Emmert & Taher, 1992;Eskildsen et al, 2004;Martensen & Gronholdt, 2001;Nachmias, 1988).…”
Section: Esi Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%