We have examined the effect of geometry optimisation on energies calculated with the quantum-mechanical (QM) cluster, the combined QM and molecular-mechanics (QM/MM), the big-QM approaches (very large single-point QM calculations taken from QM/MMoptimised structures, including all atoms within 4.5 Å of the minimal active site, all buried charged groups in the protein, and truncations moved at least three residues away from the active site). We study a simple proton-transfer reaction between His-79 and Cys-546 in the active site of [Ni,Fe] hydrogenase and optimise QM systems of 50 different sizes (56-362 atoms). Geometries optimised with QM/MM are stable and reliable, whereas QM-cluster optimisations give larger changes in the structures and sometimes lead to large distortions in the active site if some hydrogen-bond partners to the metal ligands are omitted. Keeping 2-3 atoms for each truncated residue (rather than one) fixed in the optimisation improves the results, but does not solve all problems for the QM-cluster optimisations. QM-cluster energies in vacuum and a continuum solvent are insensitive to the geometry optimisations with a mean absolute change upon the optimisations of only 4-7 kJ/mol. This shows that geometry optimisations do not improve the convergence of QM-cluster calculations -there is still a ~60 kJ/mol difference between calculations in which groups have been added to the QM system according to their distance to the active site or based on QM/MM free-energy components. QM/MM energies do not show such a difference, but they converge rather slowly with respect to the size of the QM system, although the convergence is improved by moving away truncations from the active site. The big-QM energies are stable over the 50 different optimised structures, 57±1 kJ/mol, although some smaller trends can be discerned. This shows that both QM-cluster geometries and energies should be interpreted with caution. Instead, we recommend QM/MM for geometry optimisations and energies calculated by the big-QM approach.Key Words: Quantum mechanical cluster calculations, QM/MM, geometry optimisation, density-functional theory, [Ni,Fe] hydrogenase.
2
IntroductionDuring the latest two decades, quantum mechanical (QM) calculations have been established as an important and powerful complement to experiments for the study of biochemical reactions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. In particular, it has been shown that QM calculations can give structures of active sites with an accuracy that is better than what is obtained in lowand medium-resolution crystal structures [9], and they can provide structures of transition states of putative enzyme reactions, which are hard to study experimentally. The calculations also give energies of the transition states and intermediates, which can be used to compare different putative reaction mechanisms.Two approaches are used for such calculations. In the QM cluster approach, the most important residues of the active site (typically 50-200 atoms) are cut out of the enzyme [1,2,3,4]. The geom...