Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP '07 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1316624.1316678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The quest for quality tags

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if our sample size is very small, the results point in the same direction as previous studies, e.g. [5] compared tags with the page text and back and forward link page text, and found that in 20% of the cases tags provided search data not provided by other sources.…”
Section: What Do Repository Managers Think Of Tags?supporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even if our sample size is very small, the results point in the same direction as previous studies, e.g. [5] compared tags with the page text and back and forward link page text, and found that in 20% of the cases tags provided search data not provided by other sources.…”
Section: What Do Repository Managers Think Of Tags?supporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is interesting that, especially in a multilingual context, such a high percentage of overlap exists between natural language and controlled vocabularies. In [5] authors report that the folksonomy set overlapped with the indexer set on average 19.5%. Table 4 shows that 58% of all users had clicked on tags while searching for resources, whereas 42% never used tags.…”
Section: How Do Users Tag?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We measured tag quality using collective opinion of the user community. We were able to do this because MovieLens includes an interface that lets users rate tags as "thumbs up" (good tag, I agree) or "thumbs down" (poor tag, I don't agree) for a tag [16]. Over 90% of tags in MovieLens have been rated.…”
Section: Tags: Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taggenes kvalitet og relevans blir også viktig. Sen, Harper, LaPitz, & Riedl (2007) tar opp dette i sin artikkel «The Quest for Quality Tags». De spurte brukere av systemet MovieLens om å vurdere kvaliteten av tagger de fant i systemet.…”
Section: Søken Etter Kvalitetstaggingunclassified