The random dot tachistogram: a novel task that elucidates the functional architecture of decision

Abstract

Reaction times are long and variable, almost certainly because they result from a process that accumulates noisy decision signals over time, rising to a threshold. But the origin of the variability is still disputed: is it because the incoming sensory signals are themselves noisy? Or does it arise within the brain? Here we use a stimulus – the random dot tachistogram – which demands spatial integration of information presented essentially instantaneously; with it, we demonstrate three things. First, that the latency distributions still show the variability characteristic of LATER, implying that there must be two integrators in series. Secondly, that since this variability persists despite removal of all temporal noise from the stimulus, or even trial-to-trial spatial variation, it must come from within the nervous system. Finally, that the average rate of rise of the decision signal depends linearly on how many dots move in a given direction. Taken together, this suggests a rather simple, two-stage model of the overall process. The first, detection, stage performs local temporal integration of stimuli; the local, binary, outcomes are linearly summed and integrated by LATER units in the second stage, that perform the final global decision by a process of racing competition.

β-Glycosphingolipids as Mediators of Both Inflammation and Immune Tolerance: A Manifestation of Randomness in Biological Systems

“…A decrease in the complexity of respiration occurs with aging (64). Similar variability was described for brain function, which persists despite the removal of all temporal noise from the stimulus (65). A reduction in complexity is associated with arthritis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease (66–68).…”

Information-Theoretic Neural Decoding Reproduces Several Laws of Human Behavior

“…The model is most widely applied to tasks in which the stimulus is stochastic, such as the random dot-motion task (Britten et al, 1992), with the variance of response times interpreted as the result of stimulus noise. In this paper, we interpret noise as intrinsic to the encoding process itself, and accordingly the model predicts variance in response times even with non-noisy stimuli (see also Genest et al, 2016 for supporting neural evidence).…”

Advanced Tailored Randomness: A Novel Approach for Improving the Efficacy of Biological Systems

“…Blockage of a vascular branch re-establishes the complexity of vascularization around the affected area by generating shunts (Lipsitz, 1995). Reaction times in the brain are long and variable, as they result from a process that accumulates noisy signals over time, rising to a threshold (Genest et al, 2016). This variability persists despite the removal of all temporal noise from the stimulus, and thus arises from within the nervous system.…”