A number of highly promiscuous seven transmembrane (7TM) receptors have been cloned and characterized within the last few years. It is noteworthy that many of these receptors are activated broadly by amino acids, proteolytic degradation products, carbohydrates, or free fatty acids and are expressed in taste tissue, the gastrointestinal tract, endocrine glands, adipose tissue, and/or kidney. These receptors thus hold the potential to act as sensors of food intake, regulating, for example, release of incretin hormones from the gut, insulin/glucagon from the pancreas, and leptin from adipose tissue. The promiscuous tendency in ligand recognition of these receptors is in contrast to the typical specific interaction with one physiological agonist seen for most receptors, which challenges the classic "lock-and-key" concept. We here review the molecular mechanisms of nutrient sensing of the calcium-sensing receptor, the G protein-coupled receptor family C, group 6, subtype A (GPRC6A), and the taste1 receptor T1R1/T1R3, which are sensing L-␣-amino acids, the carbohydrate-sensing T1R2/T1R3 receptor, the proteolytic degradation product sensor GPR93 (also termed GPR92), and the free fatty acid (FFA) sensing receptors FFA1, FFA2, FFA3, GPR84, and GPR120. The involvement of the individual receptors in sensing of food intake has been validated to different degrees because of limited availability of specific pharmacological tools and/or receptor knockout mice. However, as a group, the receptors represent potential drug targets, to treat, for example, type II diabetes by mimicking food intake by potent agonists or positive allosteric modulators. The ligand-receptor interactions of the promiscuous receptors of organic nutrients thus remain an interesting subject of emerging functional importance.In 1894, Emil Fischer published the landmark article in which he for the first time described the "lock-and-key" concept for enzyme-substrate interactions (Fischer, 1894). A few decades later, this concept was transferred to receptors by Paul Ehrlich and John Newport Langley when they studied receptors and their interactions with ligands (for review, see Limbird, 2004;Rang, 2004). A literal interpretetation of the "lock-and-key" concept suggests that each receptor only has one physiological agonist, which is also in line with the naming of the vast majority of liganded receptors by their main endogenous agonist (e.g., acetylcholine receptor, glutamate receptor). During the following decades, receptors were shown to adhere to this scheme, although some exceptions were discovered, such as the adrenergic receptor subtypes responding to both endogenous epinephrine and norepinephrine, albeit with different rank orders (Ahlquist, 1948). However, during the last few years, a number of receptors have been cloned and characterized that are highly promiscuous and thus respond to a range of natural agonists. In addition,