1985
DOI: 10.5840/newscholas198559139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Realism of Aquinas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 See Clark 1974 for the claim that some form of realism represents the traditional interpretation of Aquinas's views. See also Edwards 1985 andSpade 1999. Although Champeaux and Ockham both take for granted the existence of natures, or entities playing the roles associated with them, they disagree about what type of entities these natures are. According to Champeaux, the entities responsible for generating the relevant sort of intrinsic character are universals, whereas according to Ockham they are individuals.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Aquinas's Via Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 See Clark 1974 for the claim that some form of realism represents the traditional interpretation of Aquinas's views. See also Edwards 1985 andSpade 1999. Although Champeaux and Ockham both take for granted the existence of natures, or entities playing the roles associated with them, they disagree about what type of entities these natures are. According to Champeaux, the entities responsible for generating the relevant sort of intrinsic character are universals, whereas according to Ockham they are individuals.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Aquinas's Via Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Clark for the claim that some form of realism represents the traditional interpretation of Aquinas's views. See also Edwards and Spade .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É nessa direção que segue a crítica de Wolterstorff à similitudo, que considera o realismo de Tomás com "uma crucial e incurável ambiguidade, ou incoerência"(WOLTERSTORFF, 1970, p. 146). O ensaio deEdwards (2002) é desenvolvido primordialmente contra a leitura de Wolterstorff.44PANACCIO, 2000, p. 17-18. …”
unclassified