2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaebae
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The realized warming fraction: a multi-model sensitivity study

Abstract: The degree of physical-biogeochemical equilibration of the climate system determines for how long global warming will continue after anthropogenic CO 2 emissions have ceased. The physical part of this equilibration process is quantified by the realized warming fraction (RWF), but RWF estimates differ strongly between different climate models. Here we analyze the RWF spread and its physical causes in three model ensembles: 1. an ensemble of comprehensive climate models, 2. an ensemble of reduced-complexity mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The realized warming fraction (RWF), that is, the TCR‐to‐ECS ratio, is higher in CNRM‐ESM2‐1 than in CNRM‐CM6‐1, suggesting that more warming has being expressed in the former. This behavior agrees with the findings of Pfister and Stocker () based on the previous generation of Earth system models, suggesting that high‐ECS models display relatively low RWF and hence a stronger warming commitment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The realized warming fraction (RWF), that is, the TCR‐to‐ECS ratio, is higher in CNRM‐ESM2‐1 than in CNRM‐CM6‐1, suggesting that more warming has being expressed in the former. This behavior agrees with the findings of Pfister and Stocker () based on the previous generation of Earth system models, suggesting that high‐ECS models display relatively low RWF and hence a stronger warming commitment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An efficacy of « . 1 is diagnosed for most comprehensive models (e.g., Winton et al 2010), while « is close to 1 for most EMICs except for the two studied here, which are more consistent with the comprehensive models (Pfister and Stocker 2018). Assuming a constant efficacy « exceeding 1 can account for the fact that the model output lies below the dashed line in Fig.…”
Section: The Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Out of the 14 EMICs considered in that study, 8 lack interactive clouds (Eby et al 2013). In only two out of these eight models, l becomes substantially less negative with time (Pfister and Stocker 2018;Fig. S2 therein): in the Bern3D-LPX model (Ritz et al 2011) and the LOVECLIM model (Goosse et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations