2008
DOI: 10.1086/528944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Reduction of the Electron Abundance during the Pre‐explosion Simmering in White Dwarf Supernovae

Abstract: Prior to the explosion of a carbon-oxygen white dwarf in a Type Ia supernova there is a long ''simmering,'' during which the 12 C þ 12 C reaction gradually heats the white dwarf on a long ($10 3 yr) timescale. Piro & Bildsten showed that weak reactions during this simmering set a maximum electron abundance Y e at the time of the explosion. We investigate the nuclear reactions during this simmering with a series of self-heating, at constant pressure, reaction network calculations. Unlike in AGB stars, p capture… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
127
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(110 reference statements)
4
127
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the progenitor is expected to develop a neutron excess before flame ignition both during the CNO and He burning cycles and during a ∼1000 yr epoch of hydrostatic carbon burning which is sometimes referred to as "simmering." Recent studies of the "simmering" epoch indicate that when carbon burning runs away locally and a flame is born, η sim ≈ 10 −3 (Piro & Bildsten 2008;Chamulak et al 2008) in stars with zero metallicity, while stars with an initial metallicity comparable to solar will develop a neutron excess of η ≈ 1.5 × 10 −3 by the time core He burning commences.…”
Section: Iron-peak Freeze-out Yields: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the progenitor is expected to develop a neutron excess before flame ignition both during the CNO and He burning cycles and during a ∼1000 yr epoch of hydrostatic carbon burning which is sometimes referred to as "simmering." Recent studies of the "simmering" epoch indicate that when carbon burning runs away locally and a flame is born, η sim ≈ 10 −3 (Piro & Bildsten 2008;Chamulak et al 2008) in stars with zero metallicity, while stars with an initial metallicity comparable to solar will develop a neutron excess of η ≈ 1.5 × 10 −3 by the time core He burning commences.…”
Section: Iron-peak Freeze-out Yields: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.43 protons per reaction, gives 0.14 electron captures for every 12 C nuclei consumed in the above chains. At densities in excess of 10 9 g cm −3 , other electron captures become energetically feasible and the ratio of electron captures per 12 C nuclei destroyed increases to a typical value of ∼0.3 (Chamulak et al 2008). On the other hand, a proton yield as low as that found by S07 for the 2.14 MeV resonance can modify substantially the ratio of electron captures per 12 C nuclei destroyed.…”
Section: Neutronization During Carbon Simmeringmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Timmes et al (2003) proposed a linear relationship between the mass of 56 Ni and metallicity: M( 56 Ni) ∝ 1 − 0.057Z/Z . Later, Chamulak et al (2008) argued that even a zero metallicity progenitor is subject A114, page 8 of 15 to neutronization through electron captures during the time that elapses between the crossing of the carbon ignition curve and the onset of the dynamical event, i.e. until the timescale becomes on the order of 1-10 s. The neutronization during the simmering phase would affect mainly SNIa from low metallicity progenitors, and the relationship between M( 56 Ni) and Z would change slightly, to become M( 56 Ni) ∝ 0.965 − 0.057Z/Z .…”
Section: Neutronization During Carbon Simmeringmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations