2010
DOI: 10.1515/jgt.2009.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reductive subgroups of G 2

Abstract: Abstract. Let G :¼ G 2 ðKÞ be a simple algebraic group of type G 2 defined over an algebraically closed field K of characteristic p > 0. Let s denote a standard Frobenius automorphism of G such that G s G G 2 ðqÞ with q d 4. In this paper we find all reductive subgroups of G and quasisimple subgroups of G s in the defining characteristic. Our results extend the complete reducibility results of [13, Theorem 1].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only subgroups of G 2 that have the same composition factors as X are a LeviĀ 1 and A 1 < A 2 embedded via W (2). However, [28,Theorem 1] shows that X is not conjugate to either of these subgroups. Therefore X is not contained reducibly in another reductive, maximal connected subgroup nor is it contained in a Levi subgroup of G. Hence X satisfies the hypothesis of Corollary 5 and is listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Corollaries 3 and 4 Follow From Careful Consideration Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only subgroups of G 2 that have the same composition factors as X are a LeviĀ 1 and A 1 < A 2 embedded via W (2). However, [28,Theorem 1] shows that X is not conjugate to either of these subgroups. Therefore X is not contained reducibly in another reductive, maximal connected subgroup nor is it contained in a Levi subgroup of G. Hence X satisfies the hypothesis of Corollary 5 and is listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Corollaries 3 and 4 Follow From Careful Consideration Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Ste10a] and [Ste12] we find all semisimple non-G-cr subgroups of G where G is G 2 and F 4 respectively. So the result follows for these cases.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that when p = 0 there is no distinction between demanding that a subgroup H of a reductive group G is reductive or linearly reductive or G-completely reducible, but there is a huge difference in positive characteristic. The notion of complete reducibility was introduced by Serre [52] and Richardson 1 [49], and over the past twenty years or so has found many applications in the theory of algebraic groups, their subgroup structure and representation theory, geometric invariant theory, and the theory of buildings: for examples, see [2], [5], [9], [30], [35], [36], [39], [56], [57], [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%