2006
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regenerative nidi of the locust midgut as a model to study epithelial cell differentiation from stem cells

Abstract: SUMMARY A better knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms involved in stem cell proliferation and/or differentiation could reveal new methods for the treatment of some diseases. Most previous studies in the field of stem cell biology have been carried out on cultured isolated cells. In the case of adult tissue stem cells, mesenchymal bone marrow derived cells have been most widely studied, while the undifferentiated stem cells present in the epithelial tissues are less known. In order to advance f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
30
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous morphometric works show that these cells did not suffer alteration in cytoplasmic or nuclear volume during the parasitism process, in both midgut regions (Pinheiro et al, 2006), which was attributed to the high variability in the morphology of these cells, existent even in non-parasitized larvae . This variability of regenerative cells must be related to their function along the midgut; it is known that these cells may be differentiated in other epithelial cell types, presenting a high index of morphological variability (Lehane and Billingsley, 1996;Illa-Bochaca and Montuenga, 2006). However, as parasitism in D. saccharalis larvae did not bring an increase in cellular death of epithelial cells in the host insect midgut (unpublished data), the cellular reposition resultant from apoptosis is not necessarily altered by parasitism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous morphometric works show that these cells did not suffer alteration in cytoplasmic or nuclear volume during the parasitism process, in both midgut regions (Pinheiro et al, 2006), which was attributed to the high variability in the morphology of these cells, existent even in non-parasitized larvae . This variability of regenerative cells must be related to their function along the midgut; it is known that these cells may be differentiated in other epithelial cell types, presenting a high index of morphological variability (Lehane and Billingsley, 1996;Illa-Bochaca and Montuenga, 2006). However, as parasitism in D. saccharalis larvae did not bring an increase in cellular death of epithelial cells in the host insect midgut (unpublished data), the cellular reposition resultant from apoptosis is not necessarily altered by parasitism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other than the intestinal stem cells (ISC), there are two other cell types which make up the insect gut epithelium -enterocytes, which make up the majority of cells and are mainly responsible for enzyme secretion and food absorption, and enteroendocrine cells, which secrete hormones like allatostatin, tachykinin etc. Further, these cells are connected by a network of neural crest cells, which maintain the peristalsis -churning movement of the gut [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Midgut replacement, which is accomplished by regenerative cells, has been reported not only in lepidopteran species (Judy and Gilbert 1970;Waku and Sumimoto 1971;Baldwin and Hakim 1991;Uwo et al 2002), but also in other insects, highlighting differences among taxa (Humbert 1979;Jiang et al 1997;Martins et al 2006). This epithelial replacement by regenerative cells has proved to be a useful model for studying stem cell biology and regulation Hakim et al 2001;Loeb et al 2003;Illa-Bochaca and Montuenga 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%