2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regional effects of Germany’s national minimum wage

Abstract: We show that the minimum wage introduced in Germany in 2015 led to spatial wage convergence, in particular in the left tail of the distribution, without reducing relative employment in low-wage regions within the first two years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
48
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Ahlfeldt et al (2018) and Dustmann et al (2019) do not find any discernible effects on total employment using regional-level data if they account for region-specific differences in employment trends prior to the reform. Other studies that use regional wage variation distinguish between regular and marginal employment and identify negative effects; however, usually, only the effect on marginal employment is precisely estimated (Bonin et al 2019;Caliendo et al 2018;Schmitz 2019).…”
Section: Effects Of the German Minimum Wage On Employmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Ahlfeldt et al (2018) and Dustmann et al (2019) do not find any discernible effects on total employment using regional-level data if they account for region-specific differences in employment trends prior to the reform. Other studies that use regional wage variation distinguish between regular and marginal employment and identify negative effects; however, usually, only the effect on marginal employment is precisely estimated (Bonin et al 2019;Caliendo et al 2018;Schmitz 2019).…”
Section: Effects Of the German Minimum Wage On Employmentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(1) and (2) produces similar results. Ahlfeldt et al (2018) and Dustmann et al (2019) demonstrate how the estimates of the employment effects shrink towards zero when group-specific trends are included in the diff-in-diff specifications they use. This is the case because diverging pre-reform trends bias the estimator.…”
Section: Identification Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are consistent with Caliendo et al (2018a) who also report moderate negative effects on overall employment in the short run until 2015, which are mainly driven by a sharp decline in marginal employment. However, we extend the period of investigation to the medium run until the fourth quarter of 2016 and explicitly study the effects of the minimum wage on regional unemployment levels (also see Ahlfeldt et al (2018)). Moreover, we exploit variation in the minimum wage bite at a finer regional level, focusing on 257 labor market regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, unclear whether this can be linked causally to the introduction of minimum wages. Employing an inter-regional comparison, Garloff (2016) and Ahlfeldt et al (2018) do not find evidence for disemployment effects using inter-regional variation in the minimum wage's marginal impact. Garloff (2016) further documents that employment requiring the payment of social security contributions increased strongest in regions where the number of mini jobs decreased the most.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%