2017
DOI: 10.1080/07341512.2018.1449711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The reinvention of the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 1992–2012

Abstract: This article examines the most recent history of the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, with particular emphasis on how this laboratory shifted its research program from accelerator-based particle physics towards astroparticle physics, cosmology and multidisciplinary photon science. Photon science became the central experimental research program through a series of changes in the organisational, scientific, and infrastructural set-up and in its science policy context. The article shows that SLAC's reinventi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the tenacious success of the Standard Model has left aspiring physicists scrambling for new avenues to conduct physics, leading them to astrophysics and cosmology, as well as more distant fields in biology and life sciences (Galison 2016). In addition, the nature of big science infrastructures has become more heterogeneous; today we now see traditional particle accelerators and nuclear reactors work alongside synchrotron radiation, neutron scattering, and free electron laser facilities, where the empirical scope has widened to materials science, chemistry, energy, condensed matter physics, nanoscience, biology, biotechnology and pharmacology (Doing 2009;Heinze & Hallonsten 2017). Finally, big science infrastructures are no longer constrained by national security mandates, and must now compete in a global scientific market with increased mobility, transparency, and competition.…”
Section: A Critical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the tenacious success of the Standard Model has left aspiring physicists scrambling for new avenues to conduct physics, leading them to astrophysics and cosmology, as well as more distant fields in biology and life sciences (Galison 2016). In addition, the nature of big science infrastructures has become more heterogeneous; today we now see traditional particle accelerators and nuclear reactors work alongside synchrotron radiation, neutron scattering, and free electron laser facilities, where the empirical scope has widened to materials science, chemistry, energy, condensed matter physics, nanoscience, biology, biotechnology and pharmacology (Doing 2009;Heinze & Hallonsten 2017). Finally, big science infrastructures are no longer constrained by national security mandates, and must now compete in a global scientific market with increased mobility, transparency, and competition.…”
Section: A Critical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%