2015
DOI: 10.1177/0030222815593871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation Between Death Attitude and Distress: Tolerance, Aggression, and Anger

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the relation between death attitude and distress tolerance and aggression and anger. For this, 135 subjects among 7,535 professional and specialist members of the Iran National Library were selected using convenience sampling method. They replied to Death Attitudes Profile-Revised, distress tolerance questionnaire, and aggression questionnaire. The results showed that the attitudes of approach acceptance, neutral acceptance, and escape acceptance had positive relation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Neimeyer and Fortner (1997) as cited in Esnaashari and Kargar (2015), there are three main drawbacks to earlier research into death attitudes: (a) the lack of a theoretical foundation; (b) a one-dimensional focus on death attitudes; and (c) measurement problems in terms of both validity and reliability. They also mention that the DAP-R minimises these weaknesses by taking an ontological view of death, and that, by measuring several death attitudes, it presents no problems with respect to validity and reliability (Neimeyer & Fortner, 1997; as cited in Esnaashari & Kargar, 2015). Furthermore, Neimeyer (19971998) mentions that the DAP-R is currently one of the most psychometrically sound measures of death attitudes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to Neimeyer and Fortner (1997) as cited in Esnaashari and Kargar (2015), there are three main drawbacks to earlier research into death attitudes: (a) the lack of a theoretical foundation; (b) a one-dimensional focus on death attitudes; and (c) measurement problems in terms of both validity and reliability. They also mention that the DAP-R minimises these weaknesses by taking an ontological view of death, and that, by measuring several death attitudes, it presents no problems with respect to validity and reliability (Neimeyer & Fortner, 1997; as cited in Esnaashari & Kargar, 2015). Furthermore, Neimeyer (19971998) mentions that the DAP-R is currently one of the most psychometrically sound measures of death attitudes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into consideration all these associations the authors of the article claim that Neutral Acceptance appears to be the most adaptive attitude towards death in terms of well-being and decreased depression (Wong et al, 1994). Esnaashari and Kargar (2015) found that the attitudes Approach Acceptance, Neutral Acceptance and Escape Acceptance are positively related to distress tolerance and negatively related to aggression and anger. Furthermore, with respect to the attitudes Fear of Death and Death Avoidance, they point out a negative relationship with distress tolerance and a positive association with aggression and anger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to being reliably associated with reduced death anxiety, neutral acceptance of death also predicts improved mental health more broadly. For example, greater neutral acceptance of death is positively associated with psychological and physical wellbeing [46], distress tolerance [54], and meaning in life [48] and negatively associated with anger [54] and depression [46]. Notably, in contrast to escape and approach acceptance, only neutral acceptance is significantly associated with better psychological and physical wellbeing, as well as reduced depression [46].…”
Section: Neutral Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%