2012
DOI: 10.1177/1087054712464390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation Between Inattentive and Hyperactive/Impulsive Behaviors and Early Mathematics Skills

Abstract: Findings have implications for the understanding and assessment of behavior problems that are associated with early mathematics difficulties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, students with MD have more problems with cognitive tasks requiring working memory (Swanson, 2012) and inhibiting irrelevant numerical stimuli (Szücs et al, 2013) than impulsivity control, suggesting that impulsivity is not central among students with MD. Our results expand findings that teacher-rated hyperactivity and/or impulsivity is not central in mathematics performance among primary and preschool children (Merrell & Tymms, 2001; Sims et al, 2016), including adolescents with MD, but conflict with Clark et al’s (2010) finding of a significant relation between teacher-rated hyperactivity and/or impulsivity behaviors of preschool children and their mathematics performance. Inconsistent results might be because Clark et al focused on young children or did not control for the effect of inattention (see Sims et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, students with MD have more problems with cognitive tasks requiring working memory (Swanson, 2012) and inhibiting irrelevant numerical stimuli (Szücs et al, 2013) than impulsivity control, suggesting that impulsivity is not central among students with MD. Our results expand findings that teacher-rated hyperactivity and/or impulsivity is not central in mathematics performance among primary and preschool children (Merrell & Tymms, 2001; Sims et al, 2016), including adolescents with MD, but conflict with Clark et al’s (2010) finding of a significant relation between teacher-rated hyperactivity and/or impulsivity behaviors of preschool children and their mathematics performance. Inconsistent results might be because Clark et al focused on young children or did not control for the effect of inattention (see Sims et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, preschool children’s shifting-attention behaviors rated by teachers are not related to their mathematics performance (Clark et al, 2010). Although teacher-rated hyperactivity and/or impulsivity behaviors are associated more weakly with mathematics performance than inattention among primary (Merrell & Tymms, 2001) and preschool children (Sims, Purpura, & Lonigan, 2016), this association is unclear among adolescents with MD. Clark et al (2010) even showed that teacher-rated hyperactivity and/or impulsivity behaviors of preschool children are related to their mathematics performance.…”
Section: Efsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a longitudinal study of children’s developing emergent literacy skills, Walcott, Scheemaker, and Bielski (2010) reported that teacher-rated inattention of preschoolers significantly predicted kindergarten children’s phonological awareness and letter knowledge, after controlling for emergent literacy skills in preschool. Problems of attention also are associated with children’s developing mathematics skills (e.g., Sims, Purpura, & Lonigan, 2016). …”
Section: Self-regulation and Academic Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto no ocurre con las pruebas neuropsicológicas, cuyos resultados son consistentes entre diferentes evaluadores; sin embargo, su uso es más limitado por factores económicos y de especialización de examinadores. No obstante estas observaciones, otros autores utilizan de modo exitoso escalas y cuestionarios de comportamiento para la detección del TDAH en investigación, utilizando los criterios del DSM-IV y DSM-V (Barkley, 2009;Becker, 2013), la escala Conners (Sims, Purpura & Lonigan, 2012), la Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory (CADBI) (Lee, Burns, Snell y McBurnett, 2013) o la Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Teacher Rating Scale (Langberg, Vaughn, Brinkman, Froehlich, & Epstein, 2010;Becker, 2013). Los autores suelen referir un proceso de entrenamiento previo en el uso de cuestionarios y escalas de observación del comportamiento que otorgan solidez a la detección de TDAH con estos instrumentos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified