2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between monocyte to HDL ratio and no-reflow phenomenon in the patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also examined monocyte/HDL ratio (MHR) as another marker reflecting acute inflammation, which proved to be a strong predictive factor with an odd ratio of 0.321 (p value=0.002). This is similar to the data reported from Balta et al, 2016 [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also examined monocyte/HDL ratio (MHR) as another marker reflecting acute inflammation, which proved to be a strong predictive factor with an odd ratio of 0.321 (p value=0.002). This is similar to the data reported from Balta et al, 2016 [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…No-reflow has been clearly linked to increased mortality, poor outcome and increased 30 days readmission rates [15,16]. There is plethora of published work examining various predictors of no-reflow [17][18][19]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published data on Egyptian patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T. Liang and coworkers observed that the development of no‐reflow was higher in advanced age patients . A higher incidence of diffuse atherosclerosis, severe calcification, distal microvessel embolization, and microvascular diseases in elderly patients are thought to cause the development of no‐reflow . Consistent with this, we showed that advanced age was an independent risk factor in the development of no‐reflow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In these subjects, the association between high MHR values and in-hospital MACE showed an HR of 1.41 (95% CI, 1.14-1.73) and an HR of 1.44 with long-term MACE (95% CI, 1.23-1.68; M. S. Cetin et al, 2016). In addition, significantly higher MHR values were observed in STEMI patients with no reflow phenomenon compared with those of the reflow patients; in these patients, after pPCI, MHR levels were reported as independent predictors of no reflow (OR, 1.09; 95%CI, 1.07-1.12; Balta et al, 2016). Moreover, it was reported that the rates of in-hospital mortality and MACE were higher in patients with STEMI after pPCI who had higher MHR values compared with those with lower MHR values (Karataş et al, 2016), and elevated MHR levels independently predicted in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05) and MACE (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) in these patients (Çiçek, Kundi, Bozbay, Yayla, & Uyarel, 2016;Karataş et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%