The Relation Between Social Identities and Outgroup Hostility Among German Immigrant‐Origin Citizens

Abstract

One of the major drivers of societal conflict are the intergroup relations which rely mainly on social identity and which are rarely analyzed for immigrant groups. This article changes this point of view by investigating the extent to which national, ethnic, and religious identities relate to outgroup hostilities towards the majority of the German population, towards other immigrant groups, and towards Syrian refugees among immigrant‐origin citizens. We employ a theoretical framework based on the social identity approach and use new representative survey data from 2017 for Germans of Turkish descent (N = 480) and Russian Germans (N = 471). Based on multivariate linear regression analysis, we show that ethnic identity has the strongest positive relation with outgroup hostilities, with the exception of the Russian‐Germans' evaluation of the German majority population. National identity among Germans of Turkish descent lessens their hostility towards other immigrants. Our results show the importance of analyzing immigrant groups with different migration trajectories separately before making generalized claims. Not only are the identity relations different between an ingroup identification and various outgroup targets, but they are also different between the immigrant groups for the same ingroup identification and outgroup target.

The bond that binds or drives us apart? An empirical test of the national identity argument in three countries

“…In other words, the stronger a person identifies with their nation, the more likely they will be to have feelings of welfare chauvinism, i.e., diminished redistributive solidarity towards non-nationals (H3). As before, however, one can expect that welfare chauvinism particularly increases when a person has higher levels of national chauvinism or draws clear normative national boundaries (Hamidou-Schmidt and Mayer, 2021).…”

Immigrants as the ‘Antagonists’? Populism, Negative Emotions and Anti-immigrant Attitudes in Ecuador

“…This is because natives may believe that, apropos of the crisis, immigrants would return to their origin country. In other cases, countries whose citizens hold strong national identity may have higher levels of outgroup hostility towards immigrant groups (Hamidou-Schmidt & Mayer, 2020). Furthermore, perceiving a significant increase in the flow of specific immigrant groups can also fuel negative attitudes towards the phenomenon among natives (González-Paredes et al, 2022;.…”

A New Electorate? Explaining the Party Preferences of Immigrant-Origin Voters at the 2017 Bundestag Election

“…Ideally, immigrants combine their ethnic and national identity in the form of a 'dual identity' (Simon, Reichert, and Grabow 2013), using their unique situation to build on the resources provided by both cultures. However, identities might also come into conflict with each other, especially if a strong identification with the ethnic/migrant group prevents at least a minimal identification with the host society (Diehl and Blohm 2001; see also Hamidou-Schmidt and Mayer 2021).…”

“…The Michigan model has been successfully applied to the study of native voters for decades (for an overview, see Johnston 2006). Thus, our baseline assumption is that the model can also be used to explain the party preferences of immigrant-origin voters (H1).…”