1965
DOI: 10.1037/h0022002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation of drive to finger-withdrawal conditioning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the extension of this conditioning hypothesis to the human level is not without limitations because of the added problem with humans of "voluntary" responding and self-instructional sets. Nevertheless, the finger-withdrawal paradigm employed has resulted in data which are quite consistent with fear models offered at the infrahuman level (Banks, 1965;Elias, 1965;Goerk & Kamin, 1959;Wickens & Platt, 1954).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, the extension of this conditioning hypothesis to the human level is not without limitations because of the added problem with humans of "voluntary" responding and self-instructional sets. Nevertheless, the finger-withdrawal paradigm employed has resulted in data which are quite consistent with fear models offered at the infrahuman level (Banks, 1965;Elias, 1965;Goerk & Kamin, 1959;Wickens & Platt, 1954).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In appetitive salivary conditioning, the quantity of food US has been shown to be directly related to the vigor of the CR (Gantt, 1938;Wagner et al, 1964). This finding holds as well for a variety of other preparations, including acid-induced salivary conditioning (Feather, Delse, & Bryson, 1967;Warstler & Ost, 1965), GSR conditioning (Boring & Morrow, 1968), human eyeblink conditioning (Prokasy & Harsanyi, 1968;Spence, 1953;Spence, Haggard, & Ross, 1958;Spence & Platt, 1966), conditioned emotional response procedures (Annau & Kamin, 1961;Ghiselli & Fowler, 1976), finger withdrawal (Elias, 1965), heart-rate conditioning (Dykman & Gantt, 1959;Sideroff, Schneiderman, & Powell, 1971), and conditioning of the nictitating membrane in rabbits (Ashton et al, 1969;Smith, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Its internal oscillator provides optically isolated 60-Hz constant current AC stimulation. The actual shock level for individuals is normally predetermined by each participant via a scaling procedure, which establishes the level acceptable (see Elias, 1965;Levis, 1971). Such a workup procedure however would establish different levels of stimulation and serve to increase variance between participants.…”
Section: Finger Withdrawal Responsementioning
confidence: 99%