1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relations between long-latency reflexes in hand muscles, somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial stimulation of motor tracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a similar 10 ms delay between the latency of the somatosensoryevoked potential and the onset of the facilitation of the cortically evoked responses by the cutaneous stimuli (see below), again suggesting a delay of approximately 10 ms between the arrival of the cutaneous volley at the level of the cortex and its effect on the motor output. Deuschl, Ludolph, Schenck & L ucking (1989) similarly found that transcortical reflexes from digital nerves in the hand required approximately 8-10 ms for central processing. A similar type of reasoning has also been used by Burke et al (1991) to exclude a supraspinal mechanism for the earlier occurring effects in the TA following Su stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We found a similar 10 ms delay between the latency of the somatosensoryevoked potential and the onset of the facilitation of the cortically evoked responses by the cutaneous stimuli (see below), again suggesting a delay of approximately 10 ms between the arrival of the cutaneous volley at the level of the cortex and its effect on the motor output. Deuschl, Ludolph, Schenck & L ucking (1989) similarly found that transcortical reflexes from digital nerves in the hand required approximately 8-10 ms for central processing. A similar type of reasoning has also been used by Burke et al (1991) to exclude a supraspinal mechanism for the earlier occurring effects in the TA following Su stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In our subjects, early MEP potentiation was present at ISI of 20 to 25 ms. It has been calculated that the minimal afferent conduction time from the digit to the cortex is approximately 23 ms, 18 and the intracortical relay time has been estimated as being 3.5 to 8 ms. 34 This means that cortical inhibition should not begin before 26.5 to 31 ms. Furthermore, in all our patients, the first cortical giant SEP components to digital stimulation had a latency ranging from 28 to 29 ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, CC area was not correlated with LLR parameters (latency, latency difference, amplitude, and amplitude ratio of both sides). Previous studies mostly aimed to compare LLR with other NP tests such as SEP and MEP in MS (2,15,16). In addition, the CC has been a promising candidate in various studies because of its sensitivity to demyelination and axonal loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although VEP was considered to be the most useful neurophysiological test for the evaluation of MS patients in the past, there have been studies about LLR examinations in the diagnosis of MS after the early 1990s (3,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%