2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship among leadership, innovation and knowledge sharing: A guidance for analysis

Abstract: This data article describes the contingent role of knowledge sharing between two leadership styles and innovation in higher education institutions in non-western countries. The dataset investigates the second-ordered (i.e. higher construct) among the relationships of study constructs, the nested relationship which gives birth to new constructs. Further, this dataset provides guidance for readers willing to conduct research in the management field. The dataset has been collected using a self-administered questi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are similar to results in recent research (e.g. Alnajdawi et al, 2017;Elrehail, 2018). After that the discriminant validity values is assessed using Fornell-Larcker criterion (Fornell & Larcker, 1981;Jahmani et al,2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These values are similar to results in recent research (e.g. Alnajdawi et al, 2017;Elrehail, 2018). After that the discriminant validity values is assessed using Fornell-Larcker criterion (Fornell & Larcker, 1981;Jahmani et al,2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…From Table 5, the results of the first model based on the first step show a statistically significant impact of the independent variables (quality of services and customer satisfaction) combined in customer loyalty to the Jordanian telecommunication companies. The value of F = 49.4467 is significant at level 1% and the value of the coefficient of determination (R 2 = 0.344), indicates that the independent variables combined accounted for 34.40% of the variance in customer loyalty (Elrehail, 2018). In the second step the switching cost has been inserted to the regression model, the value of the coefficient of determination increased to (∆ R 2 = 1.60%).…”
Section: Second Main Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to sum up a goodness-of-fit model exists for the overall model measurement (Hair Jr et al, 2010). This accepted benchmark used by recent research (Alzghoul et al, 2018;Elrehail, 2018;Ibrahim & Aljarah, 2018).…”
Section: Bi5mentioning
confidence: 99%