2015
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between action-effect monitoring and attention capture.

Abstract: Many recent findings suggest that stimuli that are perceived to be the consequence of one's own actions are processed with priority. According to the preactivation account of intentional binding, predicted consequences are preactivated and hence receive a temporal advantage in processing. The implications of the preactivation account are important for theories of attention capture, as temporal advantage often translates to attention capture. Hence, action might modulate attention capture by feature singletons.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, acknowledgment ratings were significantly higher in the employee greeting condition than in the employee present condition (t = 4.06, p < 0.001), indicating that the scenarios behaved as intended and matched previous related research (Söderlund, 2017). Warlop, 2008) and four were treated as outliers using a cut-off of 2.5 standard deviations from the mean on the dependent variables (Kumar, Manjaly, & Sunny, 2015).…”
Section: Pretestsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Furthermore, acknowledgment ratings were significantly higher in the employee greeting condition than in the employee present condition (t = 4.06, p < 0.001), indicating that the scenarios behaved as intended and matched previous related research (Söderlund, 2017). Warlop, 2008) and four were treated as outliers using a cut-off of 2.5 standard deviations from the mean on the dependent variables (Kumar, Manjaly, & Sunny, 2015).…”
Section: Pretestsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Attention is known to expand temporal perception 22, 23 , but a recent study 73 suggested that the outcome does not capture attention when there is no predictive relationship between the action and its outcome. Given that the intended outcome was not predictable in our experiments, it is less likely that attention capture per se caused the intention-induced TEE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we focus particularly on how control over an external object influences attention. Previous studies suggested a link between attention and the sense of control (Kumar, Manjaly, & Sunny, 2015;Salomon, Lim, Kannape, Llobera, & Blanke, 2013). Salomon et al (2013) reported a phenomenon of "self pop-out" in visual search; stimuli controlled by participants' voluntary actions showed a pop-out effect in the visual search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Salomon et al (2013) reported a phenomenon of "self pop-out" in visual search; stimuli controlled by participants' voluntary actions showed a pop-out effect in the visual search. Kumar et al (2015) found that a motion onset or color change that was proceed by an action that controlled a specific object facilitated the visual search of that object. These results provided evidences of bottom-up attention drawn to objects that were actively controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%